KazuyaDarklight

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] KazuyaDarklight 35 points 6 months ago (16 children)

Or, according to Dune author Frank Herbert, from watching a man climb a mountain. (See Heretics of Dune)

[–] KazuyaDarklight 13 points 6 months ago

Based on the graphics, it seems to be from his own stream. I assume that the "excuse" at least, is that it was meant to be some kind of weird joke that falls flat out of context, probably falls flat in context too to be fair, because it's pretty weird.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean that as a relative 10%? Because this chart maxes out at 5%.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 10 points 6 months ago

Lumpi knows what's up.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] KazuyaDarklight 6 points 6 months ago

First and foremost, I think this just fundamentally wouldn't work out because it requires enough people being on a given thread at the same time, which would be on the rare side for most threads, then on top of that they also need to be in a position to talk freely, ie - Not on the toilet, not in their open floorplan cube at work. The two place most commenting happens.

More subjectively, IMO, the times this would work out and be civil and a good conversation, would be far outweighed by the ones where it went south.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 11 points 6 months ago

If you look into the history of the court, most of the Supreme Courts power today is something it's just been "allowed" to claim and has been institutionalized over time. Knocking them down a peg is doable on paper, it would just be crazy contentious since the GOP likes the current status quo.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 5 points 6 months ago

Yeah, neat idea, but if "hacking" isn't already something of a hobby, it's going to just sit around. As mine has.

[–] KazuyaDarklight 52 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (5 children)

"The popularity of Skibidi Toilet has made it a worldwide phenomenon, with a live-action movie apparently in the works."

... 😑

view more: ‹ prev next ›