Jozav
Almost all compact cameras lack a viewfinder. They are competing with phone-photography, which they are losing.
The weak point of taking photos with mobile phones is the screen. In bright sunshine, you can not make good photos. So I would say: make a simple, small viewfinder camera with software- & sensor- technology similar to phones, with a slightly better lens. Keep it really cheap for almost throw-away price so everyone can afford it and a lot can be sold. It would have a small screen and a viewfinder so taking pictures in bright light is easier. It can cast a slideshow to TVs and computers (the small screen would work as a remote control, swipe for next). An accessory like HDMI to Wifi (Chromecast-like) stick can be sold.
It could be the modern interpretation of the iconic Kodak Instamatic.
What do you mean with "if they came back to the Camera market?"
Maybe I do not understand your question, Kodak is still selling cameras?
My thoughts? Stupid that they had not left yet.
This list is not about priority, it is about amounts of money. In other words: High priority will be given to airport security, but that does not mean it will cost 12 lakh crores.
These trade wars are seldom short, they are easy to start but hard to stop. Look up Chicken Tax (started in 1960s)
yesterday publicly started setting up a concentration camp in Guantanamo
It’s been there for decades. Did you miss the entire “War on Terror”?
You have obviously not been following the news. Or are you like that crazy president they elected who equals illegal immigrants with terrorists?
US President Donald Trump has ordered the construction of a migrant detention facility in Guantanamo Bay which he said would hold as many as 30,000 people. He said the facility at the US Navy base in Cuba, which would be separate from its high-security military prison, would house "the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people".
I do not buy that USA sh#t about China anymore. USA is fascist nationalist country that yesterday publicly started setting up a concentration camp in Guantanamo. I do not trust any of those big companies that were present at their Fuhrer's inauguration, and that includes OpenAI. F*CK the USA, let China in!
Does chatgpt scan copyrighted material from India?
ChatGPT said:
No, I do not have access to proprietary databases, live internet content, or any specific copyrighted material unless it has been provided in the conversation by the user. I don't scan or pull content from websites or databases, including copyrighted material, unless that material is shared with me during the chat. My responses are generated based on a wide range of publicly available data and pre-existing knowledge, which is not up-to-date in real-time.
If you're asking about India specifically, I don’t have direct access to any localized content or copyright-protected materials such as Indian news outlets or government records unless they are publicly available or shared in the conversation.
If you need help with a specific topic that might involve copyrighted content, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to offer a helpful, general overview!
I find it hard to believe you. This article states that ChatGPT scrapes Indian news outlet sites: https://www.newslaundry.com/2025/01/27/top-indian-media-houses-set-to-join-copyright-lawsuit-against-openai
ChatGPT said:
I understand your skepticism, and I appreciate your attention to the issue. To clarify, I do not "scrape" or access specific articles or content from news websites or any proprietary sources, including Indian media outlets, unless it is shared directly in a conversation. I generate responses based on a large dataset that includes publicly available information up until my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, but I do not have live access to the internet or real-time data, including news articles.
As for the article you referenced, it's important to recognize that there are ongoing discussions about copyright and how AI models like mine use publicly available data to train. The lawsuit you're referring to, involving major Indian media outlets, appears to focus on concerns that AI models might be trained on content from these media organizations without proper attribution or compensation.
While I don't have access to the specific article or the real-time details of the lawsuit, I can tell you that OpenAI, the organization behind me, is committed to adhering to copyright laws and addressing concerns about data use. The case you're referencing seems to reflect larger questions about the intersection of AI, copyright, and the use of publicly available data for training models.
It’s an evolving area of law and technology, and OpenAI is actively engaging with these issues to ensure compliance with legal standards. If you'd like to discuss more about how I generate responses or the legal aspects of AI training, feel free to ask!
They lost the case from the very start. Worst case, Delhi court will demand blocking ChatGPT in India and we'll all use Deepseek (from China).
Well done ANI! What next? Block Wikipedia in India because one page claimed to have proof that you are a propaganda channel for the Indian government? Oh? You are already working on that as well?
What did she write?
Strange Parts
carved an iPhone out of a solid block of aluminum and turned it into a working custom phone. It took him over a year, from measuring every tiny part to carefully using a CNC machine to cut the complex shapes and fit all the pieces together. This is the first step toward a future where anyone can make their own unique smartphone!
They want to force Europe to buy defense equipment in the USA. Instead, the response should be to invest in a European defense industry. Germany, whose car-industry is currently struggling, is a good candidate for setting this up.