I do not buy that USA sh#t about China anymore. USA is fascist nationalist country that yesterday publicly started setting up a concentration camp in Guantanamo. I do not trust any of those big companies that were present at their Fuhrer's inauguration, and that includes OpenAI. F*CK the USA, let China in!
Jozav
Does chatgpt scan copyrighted material from India?
ChatGPT said:
No, I do not have access to proprietary databases, live internet content, or any specific copyrighted material unless it has been provided in the conversation by the user. I don't scan or pull content from websites or databases, including copyrighted material, unless that material is shared with me during the chat. My responses are generated based on a wide range of publicly available data and pre-existing knowledge, which is not up-to-date in real-time.
If you're asking about India specifically, I don’t have direct access to any localized content or copyright-protected materials such as Indian news outlets or government records unless they are publicly available or shared in the conversation.
If you need help with a specific topic that might involve copyrighted content, feel free to ask, and I'll do my best to offer a helpful, general overview!
I find it hard to believe you. This article states that ChatGPT scrapes Indian news outlet sites: https://www.newslaundry.com/2025/01/27/top-indian-media-houses-set-to-join-copyright-lawsuit-against-openai
ChatGPT said:
I understand your skepticism, and I appreciate your attention to the issue. To clarify, I do not "scrape" or access specific articles or content from news websites or any proprietary sources, including Indian media outlets, unless it is shared directly in a conversation. I generate responses based on a large dataset that includes publicly available information up until my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, but I do not have live access to the internet or real-time data, including news articles.
As for the article you referenced, it's important to recognize that there are ongoing discussions about copyright and how AI models like mine use publicly available data to train. The lawsuit you're referring to, involving major Indian media outlets, appears to focus on concerns that AI models might be trained on content from these media organizations without proper attribution or compensation.
While I don't have access to the specific article or the real-time details of the lawsuit, I can tell you that OpenAI, the organization behind me, is committed to adhering to copyright laws and addressing concerns about data use. The case you're referencing seems to reflect larger questions about the intersection of AI, copyright, and the use of publicly available data for training models.
It’s an evolving area of law and technology, and OpenAI is actively engaging with these issues to ensure compliance with legal standards. If you'd like to discuss more about how I generate responses or the legal aspects of AI training, feel free to ask!
They lost the case from the very start. Worst case, Delhi court will demand blocking ChatGPT in India and we'll all use Deepseek (from China).
Well done ANI! What next? Block Wikipedia in India because one page claimed to have proof that you are a propaganda channel for the Indian government? Oh? You are already working on that as well?
What did she write?
As a (former) map contributor, I will -and I hope many others with me- report it as a mistake. Of course Google will not change it back, but it does not matter.
USA and it's oligarchs have gone mad.
Does this apply to driver-to-engineer radio communications as well?
Hahaha. I had computer support calls similar to that.. .
Quill report: 0% of text is likely AI Human-written 100%
For developers, AI has become a part of the production line. It is quite simple: developer asks AI to generate a piece of code that creates a piece of code to communicate with Lemmy servers. Then the developer changes the code so it fits the application, using the knowledge they acquired during training, their work, etc.
If you can't handle that, then better not use any of the new software releases anymore, because 90% has some code in there that was touched by AI.
It is a complex case.
Wikipedia aims to be viewed as an intermediary, not as a publishing company. This distinction reduces some of their responsibilities, but it also means they must allow ANI to sue the original authors. For Wikipedia, it is strategically better not to defend the accuracy of articles in court, as doing so could classify them as a publishing company, jeopardizing their operations in India. Instead they gave the data of the authors (who seem to be largely anonymous).
While Wikipedia is largely fact-based, it is not without errors and some articles may show bias. Unfortunately, negative aspects of India often get highlighted, overshadowing the country's magnificence.
Surely in 2025 we will see Excire's AI functionality in easy to use Open Source.
You have obviously not been following the news. Or are you like that crazy president they elected who equals illegal immigrants with terrorists?
https://www.bbc.com/news