Also its not like we can just walk in.
IzzyJ
joined 2 years ago
Thats not even a good thing though. And why not put other historical figures on money? Would it be so objectionable to out MLK Jr or General Sherman on money?
They probably just know saying "Ew, I dont want no tyrant Lincoln on my money" looks really bad even now
If there were an ethical way to get rid of or away from them, Id be down. As for reaching out, thats all well and good but I am not a politician and am under no obligation to be nice
I DO want magats and those who abstained to hurt though
No. Going full bore worked for Republicans, I want it in my representatives and peers. No more reaching across the aisle, no more compromise, woke up or die
The common man keeps falling for it when he has an obligation to be better
Sounds like they shouldve sbowed up, maybe if their abstinence had consequences theyd be good little party line voters next time
Even Greenland, wtf?
It means you're a dom
If you were willing to vote for said cheeto supreme over egg prices, that makes you an idiot.
Because atp, trying to be empathetic isnt worthwhile. Long as I get my meds, surgery, and public restrooms; fuck everyone else. Theyre welcome to move, probably take up the social programs that those states will have to integrate themselves