Invertedouroboros

joined 1 year ago
[–] Invertedouroboros 7 points 11 hours ago

I wish more sovcits believed that signatures were only valid if signed in blood. At least that would add a touch of creativity to their batshit beliefs.

[–] Invertedouroboros 2 points 2 days ago

Feels like I'm receiving the facebook post via morse code.

[–] Invertedouroboros 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

"The Great Meeting", is that sovcit code for something?

[–] Invertedouroboros 3 points 3 days ago

The filibuster has never really been a thought out and considered rule of the senate so much as a fluke of debate rules. It's basically just a loop hole noone has wanted to close since the first senate. Noone's made it easier so much as debate rules have streamlined and the filibuster along with them.

[–] Invertedouroboros 16 points 3 days ago

Fuck it, I'd welcome an invasion at this point provided whatever country did it super pinky promised not to do half the shit Republicans do.

[–] Invertedouroboros 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've also ran into some issues simply accessing youtube through my vpn, but that's been going on for a while.

[–] Invertedouroboros 3 points 1 week ago

"What the hell do you have to lose" is one of those great little artifact statements from 2016. The kind that kinda could plausibly work for him back when he was a "political outsider" but I don't think it really works on anyone these days.

Even among his cult, there's an understanding and an acceptance of the fact that Trump essentially runs the republican party now. Everyone's bowed down, everyone's paid homage. Almost definitionally now, being in the republican party means you are pro-Trump. That may very well be the only metric upon which GOP politicians are judged in the modern day.

"What the hell do you have to loose" is one of those kinds of statements that worked in the context of "the establishment running the party ~~aren't racist enough~~ don't have your best interests at heart so why not give me a shot?" that comes with a kinda tacit admission that "I'm probably not going to be much better". But in 2024 Trump's just not the outsider anymore. He is the republican establishment.

Among the many other delusions he is clearly trapped in, I think he's also trapped in the delusion that he's some kinda evergreen outsider, despite the fact that he served four years as president and another four basically running the GOP opposition. I think that delusion is not helped by the fact that the republican base is so rabidly anti-intellectual that you kinda have to present yourself as "an outsider" in order to get anywhere, but if it's an outsider your looking for Trump just aint it.

[–] Invertedouroboros 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shit, even if it is a small inside joke or some shit, I can't imagine the conversation nor the thought process that leads to "I'm gonna pose for a camera with a make believe jar of J.D. Vance's jizz. Like, the fuck do you have to be on to think that's even a remotely good idea?

[–] Invertedouroboros 23 points 2 months ago

Bro took a long shower I guess.

[–] Invertedouroboros 6 points 2 months ago

Absolutely. So much of the right wing media space is inhabited by, funded by, and glorifies grifters that they've created a constant chunk of their audience that is vulnerable to their tactics. Values or policy prescriptions don't even really need to come into it, if you are a grifter it's just a smart business decision to start drifting to the right. It opens up those audiences to you because you are "one of them".

[–] Invertedouroboros 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There's also just no creativity. I'm pretty sure I saw a new "let's go Brandon" sign out and about recently. By this point that is very nearly a three year old meme. Like, I'm not really surprised that they can't do better, but it's a little telling that they come up with one thing they think is "good" and stuck with it basically though Biden's entire presidency. "Creatively bankrupt" does not even begin to describe it.

[–] Invertedouroboros 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I think it'd also count as a full term in office so far as the rule against running more than twice goes. So you could run for reelection, but that isn't a "one werid trick" to getting three terms in office.

5
Ok so I have to ask (self.breadtube)
 

I broadly speaking understand what breadtube is, and I've followed a fair few youtube channels that were part of it. But I've never understood why it's called "bread"tube. Does anyone know where that name comes from?

view more: next ›