Sorry, that wasn’t my point. If the driver had to hop a curb to threaten the cyclist, how would the cyclist have been able to simply “pulled to the side” to let him past when there’s a curb between them.
Hawke
You may have missed the part where the driver of the BMW “hopped the curb” “at 70”. I have some doubts about the speed, but if you’re going over a curb at speed to try to pass someone, you’re in the wrong.
“On accident” is not right. “By mistake”, “by accident”, opposite of “on purpose”
To me it reads more like speech recognition trying its best with a strong accent or bad audio source.
Nah. I’m plenty old enough and it’s a shit headline, probably purposeful ragebait.
More than 800 service members ejected from US military under ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’
WTF how is that possible, is that still in effect in some way??
receive honorable discharges
… oh. Whew.
Didn’t say you had to. You do you.
UV light damages the plastics that the helmet is made of. Impacts, even small impacts, compress the foam. Temperature fluctuations burst the bubbles in the foam and cause stress which weakens the plastic.
The paragraph explains why even if it doesn’t explain how.
m^2^ or bust!
You mean like this?
Neither really. The mechanism intended to hold the storage compartment open failed, and the bed was too heavy for the woman to lift off herself in the limited time before she lost consciousness and then asphyxiated.
Yes but in this case it likely makes little difference.
It does seem like there’s something “off” about that description. Itd be interesting to know where this all happened.
I can imagine a driver raging at a cyclist and then later chasing them and hopping a curb to threaten. Or hopping the curb onto a sidewalk to pass them and swerving back onto the road in a threatening manner. Both strike me as very much dangerous and disproportionate reactions to having to go a bit slow for 30 seconds.