GarrulousBrevity

joined 1 year ago
[–] GarrulousBrevity 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Oop, and you need to have the last word too, checking that off the bingo card

Edited to add: they just couldn't help themselves

[–] GarrulousBrevity 0 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Loser" still fits nicely in that caricature.

[–] GarrulousBrevity 0 points 2 days ago (5 children)
[–] GarrulousBrevity 0 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I am not a Nazi, but you are a caricature of an internet argument

[–] GarrulousBrevity 1 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Ah yes, calling a stranger a Nazi on the Internet. A compelling point

[–] GarrulousBrevity 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't want to sound like a contrarian, but I'm struggling to figure out how this relates to the previous comments.

I will say, as much as I am being argued with for saying that the history of Germany's history with Israel is complex, and the history of Zionism is complex, no one is really responding in a way that doesn't sound like the Charlie Day red string board meme.

When I look at the current state of Israel and Palestine, I see a lot of people backed into corners. Netanyahu knows that if he loses power, he'll be arrested for corruption, so will do anything to support his base, who are the worst of the Zionists this thread is about, so he only has an incentive to continue butchering Palestinians.

I see the US not wanting a nuclear armed Israel to feel that they are out of defensive options against their neighboring countries, and as such feels a need to keep supplying weapons and intelligence so that Israel is only, merely, butchering Palestinians, instead of something worse.

I see the Palestinians being sacrificed, which is causing some of them to need to fight back, so they're radicalized, and join Hezbollah.

And I see the rest of the region wanting to punish Israel for their heinous actions.

And looking at this as a US citizen, my experience is that the people who want to make it look like the solution to solving this is easy, are also usually trying to get you to vote for Jill Stein, and I'm not convinced that it isn't an astro-turfed movement to push for spoiler votes to get Trump in office.

I would like it if we could say the situation is nuanced, and then talk about the nuance, rather than scream that it's cut and dry

[–] GarrulousBrevity 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I think you're conflating being Jewish with Judaism. His religious beliefs aren't really what's in question here, @[email protected]'s comment sums the idea up well. Herzl was, with no ambiguity, a member of the Jewish community.

[–] GarrulousBrevity -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, your argument that it's not complicated is that Israel was founded by antisemitic Jews? I'm not even saying that you're factually wrong, but you keep insisting that this isn't complicated. It is complicated, and the more you insist that it's simple, while giving increasing amounts of fine details is not particularly convincing

[–] GarrulousBrevity 28 points 3 days ago (34 children)

Well, Germany does have some history there

[–] GarrulousBrevity 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Agreed that I'm having a hard time deciding where I am on this one. They could use the test to do that kind of thing, but not making it a requirement for graduation takes away the teeth, and I'm not sure how its going to be enforced going forward. The prop just kind of implies that the particulars would be decided after the vote, but I would feel better about it if the question of "How do we prevent harm to under privileged students who have been historically neglected" wasn't an afterthought. It feels a bit... Well... Neglectful.

view more: next ›