GaMEChld

This is why it's always decades away. However, I doubt China is being as cavalier about it.

I mean... It's a feeling. Dysphoria is a complex thing, it's not as clear cut as, let's skip right to surgery.

https://www.healthline.com/health/transgender/can-gender-dysphoria-go-away

Therapy and/or hormone treatment certainly might make enough difference to not require surgery anymore.

Let's not pretend that the act of transitioning is something that should be taken lightly. There are trans people who have been wholly unprepared for actually living life as the opposite gender and kill themselves. For example, I'm seeing cases of Female to Male trans saying they were completely unprepared for how lonely it is to live as a man compared to a woman. So for some of them that negative feeling of loneliness ended up being even more detrimental and unpleasant to them than the original dysphoria.

Yeah! At the local monthly illegal alien meeting! Durrr.

Here's a question for you, if we have a 4th amendment, why do we have to deal with cops just knocking on doors asking for papers without a warrant? My time has no value? Can I bill them my hourly consultant rate?

Ohhhh they were the idiots with the AAAA claim! Haha ok yeah now I remember hearing that and rolling my eyes.

Why would you marry a bad spouse? You should figure that out before you marry them.

How about this, what's the point of marriage? If it can be discarded at a whim, what does it mean in the first place?

I mean the problem with this entire discussion is marriage has no standard meaning anymore. Traditionalists think of it as a sacred vow, taking till Death do us part very seriously. Others think of it as some irrelevant social construct and an excuse to have a party.

I'm in the camp of it's forever or it it's pointless. Life is change. People change. The work that goes into marriage is the work of ensuring you grow together, not grow apart. I wouldn't marry anyone that didn't agree.

I guess that's the bottom line. Make sure you both define marriage the same way before you get married. Which sounds obvious but... ::gestures around::

Let's go slowly so you can follow my thought process.

1. They are members of the Democratic Party. You cannot dispute that.

2. The Democratic Party is a political organization.

3. The DNC is the leadership of the Democratic Party.

4. I am dissatisfied with the DNC's handling of the party.

5. These Democrats in the article doing as they please and, as you said, don't care about what the DNC thinks is the exact symptom of the exact problem I'm talking about.

Are you familiar with the phrase it starts at the top? Maybe if the party exhibited stronger leadership and more unity, you wouldn't have factions running amok with no unified front.

Do you remember how unified the Republican Party was when Obama was elected? That's a unified front.

What was their latest debacle? I lose track of which gaming company screwed what up.

A backlog of 3.7 million cases... Jesus.

AF1 probably needs a database just for it's in in-flight menu.

He didn't say the SSN database isn't SQL. He said the GOVERNMENT doesn't use SQL.

Uh... We... Need an adult?