If this is the case, they have to publish the polling data that led them to believe it. Otherwise there's no reason to give them the benefit of the doubt.
But it's not just the first few that take much longer to build and get more expensive, it's all of them. Every recent nuclear project that I'm aware of had these issues, even in countries that keep building them.
Eaten baguettes? Hon hon hon
I don't think that's what we're talking about? As an example, if I ask an LLM for good spots to get Bratwurst and it recommends places in New York, it's fairly useless to me as a European.
How so? For pretty much any application in the EU, EU-centric results are obviously much better?
If I were a maintainer in that position I’d be barring the doors too. It’s not a driver for some esoteric realtek wireless card or something.
This effectively kills R4L. If they can't include Rust Interfaces for important subsystems, each driver written in Rust that uses these subsystems has to separately track all the Subsystem Interfaces, leading to lots of extra work for no benefit.
If this is the approach Linux takes, they should just cancel R4L completely.
This creates a lot of extra work for no benefit, as every driver that needs DMA would have to include their own copy of the DMA stuff.
In the coat? I think that's a woman
Nah, there's a bunch of people (even on Lemmy) that recommend Arch or Arch-derived distributions to newbies. Many mention they haven't used any other distro themselves.
Looks like Riker and Picard, tho I haven't watched a lot of Star Trek
The shape of their container!
I think most people can. Or do you mean without biting into it?