EncryptKeeper

joined 2 years ago
[–] EncryptKeeper 1 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Yes linguistically that’s what the those two words mean.

But in the context of a messaging app, “Multi device” becomes one singular term with a set meaning agreed upon by everybody but you, that you’re trying desperately to change by deconstructing the words it’s composed of in order to misrepresent something that you evidently like a whole lot.

[–] EncryptKeeper 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

If you’re looking for a replacement, there are a lot of similar apps out there you can host yourself (And therefore can’t be killed) or pay a fee to have hosted for you.

https://linkwarden.app/ Is the one I use.

There’s also:

[–] EncryptKeeper 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

No, lol. “Multi-device” does not just mean “multiple devices can be involved”. It means “Multiple devices can operate independently”

And you know that. But you’re splitting hairs to try and fit this use case into something it’s not.

[–] EncryptKeeper 2 points 3 months ago (6 children)

2 devices that can’t function independently. That would make it functionally one device. You’re just splitting hairs now.

[–] EncryptKeeper 2 points 3 months ago

The three main characters in this poster are all from Marvel movies.

[–] EncryptKeeper 55 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If you’re a seasoned developer who’s using it to boilerplate / template something and you’re confident you can go in after it and fix anything wrong with it, it’s fine.

The problem is it’s used often by beginners or people who aren’t experienced in whatever language they’re writing, to the point that they won’t even understand what’s wrong with it.

If you’re trying to learn to code or code in a new language, would you try to learn from somebody who has only half a clue what he’s doing and will confidently tell you things that are objectively wrong? Thats much worse than just learning to do it properly yourself.

[–] EncryptKeeper 1 points 3 months ago

You got public humiliation kink or something? No judgement lol.

Thank goodness for the downvote system so your comments can be safely buried where they can’t misinform people.

[–] EncryptKeeper 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Oh brother read the room why don’t ya. It’s not too late to delete this lmao.

[–] EncryptKeeper -4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The content of your argument exists only in your head, there’s nothing any of us on the outside can do for you there.

[–] EncryptKeeper 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah and you get to that point when fans rally around a beloved game renewed by mods over literally decades. If your game is dogshit from the start, that just doesn’t happen. It literally happened with Starfield as some of the most well known Bethesda game modders abandoned the game entirely.

[–] EncryptKeeper 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Lmao it’s like comical how when presented with a crossroads of how to get back to printing money, EA has chosen the one path least likely to help them make any money.

[–] EncryptKeeper 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I hate to be the dream-squasher here but the technology will quite literally never get there. You’re thinking along the same lines as Back to the future where 2015 is filled with flying cars and sky-highways.

view more: ‹ prev next ›