Eatspancakes84

joined 1 year ago
[–] Eatspancakes84 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I think you are touching on some real issues, BUT the Harris campaign never said that the economy was doing great. They very deliberately avoided that message (though Biden was very different).

[–] Eatspancakes84 2 points 1 week ago

They are taught to few the world as a zero sum game. What they do not realise is that they are the losers.

[–] Eatspancakes84 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can simultaneously lend support and analyze why the probability of success is quite small. Anyway, this is an anonymous forum. Start a petition and I will sign it with my name.

[–] Eatspancakes84 2 points 1 week ago

Sorry I did not mean to both-side it. I am well aware that a union push will never come from the GOP. The main point was that because everything has become politicized there are no independent voices that can call for a national strike. If you want to dive deeper into why all is politicised you obviously come back to the conservative sphere (FOX, etc), so this is definitely not a both sides are bad argument.

[–] Eatspancakes84 4 points 1 week ago

Yes, but it is really inefficient. If we simply ignore the nuke threat it would probably take the US a month of bombing to restore pre 2014 borders.

[–] Eatspancakes84 7 points 1 week ago

I am guessing that outside of the frontlines bombings are still fairly rare events. Risk is low enough for installing proper windows, but high enough to ensure there are not enough.

[–] Eatspancakes84 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This already started with the Vietnam war, where France warned the US not to get involved. There’s a lesson here but I can’t quite put my finger on it.

[–] Eatspancakes84 25 points 1 week ago (12 children)

The first problem is the polarisation. If people that are perceived to be Democrats call out a general strike, 50 percent won’t participate. Vice versa if perceived GOP does this. The polarisation and politicisation of every topic is what stops you from organising effectively.

[–] Eatspancakes84 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

To be honest I was very worried that he would assign competent and evil people to his cabinet positions. Somewhat relieved that he has only appointed clowns so far.

[–] Eatspancakes84 1 points 2 weeks ago

Then stop upvoting this stuff! During election time every damn article upvoted here was about i.) horse race reporting or ii.) Trump outrage. We have to stop clicking these links and sharing the articles.

[–] Eatspancakes84 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This would imply years of (effectively) being out of power. Even if by some miracle you would win the presidential election, you would have no local infrastructure to build on. It would give the GOP effective power in many states for an another decade.

On the other hand, look at how easy it was for Trump to completely hijack the GOP. That’s the model you should aim for.

[–] Eatspancakes84 2 points 2 weeks ago

I can see why you could be concerned about the details of her home building plan (I am too). But let’s face it, this election was not lost because Kamala did not provide policy details. I would love for campaigns to revolve around these, but they don’t.

view more: ‹ prev next ›