I really don't think you do, you are being incredibly closed minded and sticking your head in the sand. Because it has no* effect on you (yet).
That is a bold assumption to make. I’ve absolutely been affected by it on Reddit, and I’ve been banned from subreddits from saying the “wrong” things. Hell, I’m a lesbian who was banned from r/ActualLesbians because I said lesbians are attracted to women and not non-men.
I’m not sticking my head in the sand.
If you have controversial opinions just post them on controversial subs as well. A large part of "the right things" depends on the "right community"
That is entirely correct.
For ages = for one week in the Central Europe. I had a trip booked for roughly exactly the duration of the eruption back then.
It was shut down entirely for a week initially, and then would be shut down again periodically as the ash/debris cloud floated along through air lanes.
Also that totally sucks.
But not 'being a dick' is far too subjective in a global village... The world does not beat to one drum.
While I hear what you’re saying, it’s really not as complicated as you’re making it out to be.
I think that is too idealistic. It could very easily go into a downward spiral that a community could never get out of. It happens already on several subreddits already. You may not have experienced it, but I can say it for certain happens. There have even been scifi series written about it that have taken the concept to the extreme.
I’m familiar with some of the subreddits, but I believe you’re taking the spiral too steeply and too quickly.
The “don’t be a dick” philosophy will get you more than enough karma to comment on whatever subreddit you want to participate in, outside of some super niche ones.
The coast guard is awesome. Definitely “bear and shrimp boil” kind of people.
Seriously though. Why are some people so okay with being trampled on by the rich, but if the government wants to give you healthcare they’re somehow the devil?
Many people, especially libertarians, imagine a government to be a highly corruptible monolith; they also imagine these companies to be dynamic and ever changing.
Thus a government will always be corrupt and always try to push you down; Coca-Cola might be corrupt for now but will grow out of it as soon as we get new blood in leadership roles. Heck, I might even be the one to do it. Get in on the ground floor, put in a little time and elbow grease, you never know.
It’s obviously not a position based in reality or historic precedent.
I'm an engineering manager, started from the bottom now I'm here. Really, went junior dev / qa - dev - senior - staff then software architect then technical manager. Management is as hard as coding, but in a different way. Just because someone is not smashing their mechanical keyboards 8 hours per day doesn't mean they're lazy.
Thanks for your perspective. My career has followed a similar trajectory to yours, albeit in a completely different industry.
I’m getting tired of the short sighted version of antiwork which says only the worker drones have merit.
Br*tish “people”
Why is “people” in quotes?
Let's put it this way then. All of management could take a month off, and very little would be affected. If all the workers go on strike for a month, not a single thing would get done.
Again, I disagree. Plenty would not happen if all of management disappeared, just like plenty would not happen if all of workers disappeared.
Look, I get it. We all hate managers and the C suite. But pretending like these roles are aren’t vital is detrimental.
Volcanic eruptions are always exciting.