Casallas

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is a much larger factor in the drop off of mortgage requests, the "lock in" phenomenon is a real thing. It seems like there's a lot of ignoring of this very simple fact. If you have a rate of 2.4% then why would you switch to a rate of approaching eight percent?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

LI is flooding too, it's crazy

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

So worth it, only problem is finding time to play all the awesome games! 🤣

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Honestly a lot of people who casually use reddit, probably don't know and aren't deep enough into the reddit world to care much

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The Apple TV show for me to start Foundation! Enjoying it so much

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Amazing book! Loved it +1

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is the fan sound bad?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's the real question, people going to be vanishing

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How does it do on battery? And heat?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you! I remember reading a bit about this but clearly it didn't stick! Thank you for the awesome explanation!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was doing some research and it seems like arrow function preserves 'this' context. Might be a reason to either classic or arrow. The overloading seems like a valuable option too.

 

This may be a very stupid question. But I was wondering if I should be using arrow function syntax or the classic function syntax for react components now or is this purely a style choice. I ask this purely as someone trying to work towards industry standards but have found a tremendous amount of mixed comments on it. Also is there any difference using typescript?

Example: const foo = () => {}

Or

function foo() {}

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Did you play the first? It was awesome!

view more: next ›