Bgugi
So long as society feels it necessary to provide protections for women, the distinction has real consequences. Drawing a line anywhere is a tradeoff between inclusivity and effectiveness.
Taking the party line "high ground" stance of either conclusive self-determination or dodging the question entirely is why this question is so effective.
Not really. I stayed at the Venetian last year, and my my room didn't include the sphere view in either the features or as an upcharge. (The sphere is "part of" the Venetian, so they'd be the most likely to advertise rooms with a view.) Their room is quite a bit further than mine was. They may have paid for the strip view, but without specific advertising they probably would not be able to tell ahead of time if they'd have LOS on the sphere.
This is not a shitpost.
This is not a shitpost.
YEEEEEEAAAAAAAHHHHH
An electric blanket is one of the best ways to warm up when you're "chilled to the bone". Layer them between normal blankets to make the most of the heat and keep them clean, and you can get whole body heat for a tenth the cost of even a little space heater.
But more importantly, I'm furious that infinite excluded hugh
...keep building legal and easy housing. Megacorps and oligarchs get crushed when the bubble pops underneath them.
Lol, somebody forgot the sound of trees.
Spell: fix this. Result: this is fixed.
Honestly? I think that equal treatment should be afforded regardless of gender. I also know that opinion is wildly unpopular, and so long as society expects unequal treatment there has to be hard conversations and hard decisions made to support those structures. You can't have it both ways, and no amount of party-line fingers in your ears "wouldn't you like to know"ing makes that go away.