I'm mot sure I understand what kind of answer you are looking for. What did the Whig historiography achieve? Or the Great Man theory? Isn't Critical Theory an academic approach that allows people in the humanities a different theoretical framework to approach the problems of culture, history, literature, etc? It's been pretty successful in that, and while I believe that academic scholarship has some influence on world affairs, it's generally the political zetgeist exerts more pressure on academic thinking than the other way around...
The Queen apparently watched the amazing 80s Flash Gordon movie every Christmas. And it's about overthrowing a tyrannical monarch....
I get the sense from your wording that you might be in the younger end of the spectrum. Although the world can feel pretty shitty and messed up, it's often worth remembering "this too shall pass". Obviously no one wants the world to be awful, and living through hard times isn't desirable, but just like the good stuff never lasts, the bad stuff changes too. The Great Depression lasted a decade, the Nazis ran Germany for just a bit longer.
Those were presumably fucking dreadful times to live through. But the decades that followed were comparatively prosperous for the countries. What's happening in the US is depressing as all hell, but it'll change, and all you can do is the best you can to make it less dreadful, for yourself and the people around you.
I've used (and loved) Sleep as Android for yeeears. It's a great app and the developer is always adding extra things, new wearable integration and stuff. So, I really don't mean to bitch because I think it's a solid app with solid support. But I recommended it to a friend the other day and they pointed out the unlock is now €69.99!! I~~ think it was a fiver when ~~just checked my email, it was €1.99 in 2013 when I unlocked it.
Defintely recommend, and I think the free version is still pretty amazing. But wow, even with extra features, that's some inflation.
Thia is exactly the video I was thinking of. I only came across his channel recently, and it is an absolute pleasure.
Totally agree. Seeing how "Internet like" communication existed before the Internet is always fascinating to me. Whether it's fanclubs, wargaming zines or Enlightened era correspondence, people have had written interactions with effective strangers for centuries. But it was incredibly different before.
The very act of sitting down to write, paying some money and effort to literally post it probably had a huge calming effect on idle bad faith takes. And I imagine that getting a letter with someone telling me names for thinking McCoy is better than Spock would probably make me feel derisively sorry for the poor nerd who went to the effort.
My take is that written communication is hard, unless a) you know each other really well, e.g. messaging friends, or b) you write carefully and with enough detail to help the other person understand fully your position, and they bother reading with the same care.
When you read an essay or article it of often begins by setting out the problem, giving some context and even defining their priorities and approach, before they make a claim or argument. They spend time addressing the obvious criticisms of their argument, and ideally admiting weak spots, and maybe even empathising with why someone might reject their position. This means that when you read an article like that, even if argues against something important to you, you don't feel attacked. It's calm, general reasoning, and obviously not a personal a attack on you as an individual.
But if you post an picture of the secondhand car you've saved for two years to afford, and the first comment is "fuck cars, they're killing the planet" it's easy to feel like it's a personal and it's aggressive. Or if you write a pretty reasonable but contraversial opinion, people might not have the time or will to break it down and explain why it's wrong, but they don't want other people to read it and think it's okay, so they down vote and comment a quick "what is this shit ?"
I'm not sure I really understand the question. 'this' and 'that' are both used to tlsk about something when it's obvious from context what you're referring to.
Situation - in a bakery "i want that" (pointing at the cake on the shelf) "I want this too" (pointing at the bread by the counter) Next customer "i want the same"
Situation - you're on a date in fancy restaurant, you're date has just finished explaining she wants to have lots of children "I want that" (the children she's been discussing) "but I want this too" (gesturing around at the adult single life you're enjoying " " I want this too" she reassures you
I don't think there's much variation between the main English dialects / varities. This and that are key grammatical words.
As a non American, Thomas Jefferson is pretty famous as historical figures go.
Morris is defintely a first name in Britain. I went to school with a Morris Morrison.
That's interesting. I'm not a film guy at all, and it certainly never occurred to me that it pioneered some of the key stuff in modern movies (although that totally makes sense). But I remember enjoying it! The pacing felt quite good, there were some mysteries and character drama. Not a top movie for me personally, but pretty watchable for a B&W movie.
Lots of folks seem to have hobbies or put themselves through challenges that from the outside seem pretty masochistic. They generally claim they like the challenge, want to prove themselves or some other thing, but people who run the Marathon de Sable or swallow a Cessna light aircraft sure seem to gain pleasure from putting themselves through pain...