0xtero

joined 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago

As is the case normally with these "exodus" things, most people went back to Reddit after the first month here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm old school. I use text files

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Somehow I don't think many instance admins have resources or knowhow to drive legal processes against Meta?

And while a disclaimer on the instance page might have some effect, the Federation protocol makes it hard to avoid getting a copy of the said content in your cache.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (3 children)

How do we accomplish that?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

I bet he does. You can block/mute influencers pretty easily and you can block the whole domain if you so wish.
He's talking about some kind of nefarious ad injection into ActivityPub objects as part of server to server activities.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I think he's talking about people on his own instance.
He's Fosstodon admin, so pretty sure he knows how federation works.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

doesn’t mean we have to hand it to them on a silverplatter and allow them to scrape it legally

They could have just set up a simple Pleroma on Raspberry Pi and it would have been just as "legal" as any other instance. You'd need to turn on AUTHORIZED_FETCH and set up authentication on the Mastodon API, otherwise everything is public and unauthenticated (even if the instance is suspended/defederated).

But if enough instances say no, that means they are not welcome. Democracy and all

mastodon.social has already said yes. So have all the other big instances. Most of them have said "we'll wait and see". So democracy served I guess

And the last point is the dumbest: Threads will just include a revenue sharing model like Youtube does

Yeah, maybe. Who knows. I'll deal with it when it happens rather than knee-jerk years in advance. Threads has a long way to go, it's missing a lot of features to put it on par with their other commercial competitors, so I think they're going to be busy doing other things.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Yeah, that's pretty much my take as well.

All the "but muh datas" pearl clutching is just annoying and frankly, ridiculous. If they wanted to mine us, they already would have. They're probably doing it as we speak. They didn't have to create a multi-million social network for it. A raspberry pi on someones desk would have sufficed. Fedi doesn't have any (/very much) privacy.

They're doing this to escape the wrath of EU privacy watchdogs. They were already fined for $1.3bn and more is coming. Running their Twitter killer on interoperable protocol is nice, because it's free and they get to point at W3C and say they're LIKE TOTALLY supporting data portability. Why would they "extend and extinguish" that? It's their alibi.

I don't like Meta. It's a shit company ran by shit people. I hope they burn in hell.
But I can't really get my panties in a twist about threads.net existing.

I'll get angry if they somehow figure out to push ads to my face.

But for now. Maybe I'll block it. Maybe I won't. We'll see.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Why are they still in EU? Isn't it time to revoke their membership card and benefits?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago

Yeah will be interesting to see if they enable two-way federation. It's problematic for them

[–] [email protected] 43 points 9 months ago (10 children)

Not more than it is now. Everything is already public so if they need it, they've already been collecting it. This doesn't really change anything.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Will be interesting to see how they deal with nazis and CSAM from all the Japanese servers.

view more: ‹ prev next ›