this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

science

14814 readers
190 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

big jobs programs incoming. best of luck to all involved. friggin ars'e, had to trim a short novel off that url

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Uuuuh. There are only a couple lagrange points, unlike the massive amount of normal satellite paths available in LEO and HEO.

We absolutely should not allow any single actor (apart from the UN, maybe) to lay claim to the precious lagrange real estate

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Could we drag a big asteroid to each Lagrange point and let countries orbit their satellites around that?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You already orbit Lagrange points, and there's already tons of space rocks milling about in them.

Lagrange points are weird.

[–] m3t00 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Webb uses one. Mostly empty space though it's suffered a few micrometeoroid strikes already. https://jwst.nasa.gov/content/about/orbit.html

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Restarted, the Star Wars have.

[–] m3t00 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

funny you mention Reagan's signature secret. I probably won't be here to see it but I believe we will eventually be able to destroy nukes in their silos or shortly after launch. AI to detect and target in real time. they aren't doing nothing with trillions of dollars.

[–] OmenAtom 5 points 11 months ago

We already can detect nukes and shoot at them. The problem is if you miss even once thats a whole city gone, and you only have a few minutes to take the shot.