this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2023
26 points (96.4% liked)

worldnews

4949 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil. Disagreements happen, that does not give you the right to personally insult each other.

  2. No racism or bigotry.

  3. Posts from sources that aren't known to be incredibly biased for either side of the spectrum are preferred. If this is not an option, you may post from whatever source you have as long as it is relevant to this community.

  4. Post titles should be the same as the article title.

  5. No spam, self-promotion, or trolling.

Instance-wide rules always apply.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For years, U.S. government reports and independent experts have expressed vague concerns about the old base, Lop Nur. The reports point to possible preparations for year-round operations and a “lack of transparency.”

Now, however, waves of satellite images reveal that the military base has newly drilled boreholes — ideal for bottling up firestorms of deadly radiation from large nuclear blasts — as well as hundreds of other upgrades and expansions.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] venoft -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, how many of these kind of sites do you think the US has? Maybe we should express vague concern about those too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One - the Nevada Test Site. There's a monthly tour of it from Las Vegas.

The US has shifted non-detonation nuclear stockpile verification, and hasn't set one off since the 1992.