https://cuberule.com/ was made to answer such queries
this post was submitted on 19 Dec 2023
12 points (80.0% liked)
We Disagree
23 readers
6 users here now
Post any opinion and everyone will disagree with you on someway or another. Great place to argue just to argue and roleplay.
Rules:
- Try to take a stance that does make sense (for example no paradoxes)
- Each comment has to disagree on some level to the previous one. You can also change your stance between comments, but don't self reply.
- Do not start chains that push the comments to break the server's rules.
- Have fun. You don't have to agree with what you post here.
founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
You see what you did. Now a hotdog is a taco.
So a pie is a quiche but if you slice off a piece, that piece is toast?
Crearly that is just sarcasm. The food is defined of how you eat it, not how it is formed.
Is a hamburger a sandwich? Or is it a hamburger? A hotdog is a hotdog. Hotdogs on 2 slices of bread, thats a hotdog sandwich. Hotdog in a bun is not a sandwich.
A hamburger is a specific sandwich, just like a hot dog.
By that logic, everything on the taco bell menu is a taco. Just specific types of tacos.
How do you figure? What we call a hamburger now was originally called a "hamburger sandwich". A burrito has never been called a "burrito taco".
Just because it used to be called something doesnt make it correct. We could go through a pile of things that used to be called something that are incorrect to call it that now. Not going to get into specifics with that one but you get what I mean. But also what if the hamburger isnt shaped into a patty? Just cooked and put on a bun. Its called a loose meat sandwich. Same ingredients. Different name. Served on a hamburger bun. Specificity is important. Taking the same ingredients and changing the way they are presented changes them completely. A tostada or chimichanga are just deep fried versions of a taco or a burrito. But you call them what they are. You dont call a tostada a taco, because then youd have a taco. You dont ask for a hotdog and get sliced hotdogs on 2 pieces of bread. You get a get a delightful hotdog in a bun. Generalizing and classifying it as a sandwich doesnt do it justice because it is its own entity. And I hope you dont take this rant too seriously because we are arguing semantics for fun and I enjoy this debate lol
Well, it all tastes identical ...
so, by your definition, if you cut the bun into two pieces of bread the hotdog becomes a sandwich?
But its still on a hotdog bun. If it were on slices of bread it would then be a sandwich. The delivery system is important to this.
a bun is a bread
A hot dog is a steak?
Food Theory did a pretty extensive review of what makes a sandwich, and their conclusion, based on a court case, is that a hotdog doesn't fit the legal definition of a sandwich. Their results are at 15:05 in the linked video.
the legal definition of a sandwich
enforced by
Thank you yes. A hot dog is not a sandwich and never will be.
A long video of people being wrong is no argument.
Quoting law is also nonsensical. Indiana almost passed legislation defining π to be equal to 3.
Quoting Indiana law is nonsensical and oxymoronic, which you would know if you'd ever been.
Providing an example is demonstrative, you silly goose.
A kind of taco is not a sandwhich. What makes a sandwhich is the way of how to eat it.