this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5324 readers
407 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
32
Food producers turn to greener fertilisers to reduce carbon footprints (archive.is)
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

From baguettes to beer, the world’s leading food and drinks makers are rushing to reduce their carbon footprint by tackling one of the hidden culprits of emissions in their value chains: fertilisers.

Ahead of disclosure rules for greenhouse emissions throughout their supply chains enacted next year, companies including PepsiCo, Heineken and Nestlé have turned to green fertiliser start-ups to help tackle emission levels.

Crop nutrients underpin production of half the world’s food but contribute significant CO₂ emissions at the same time. Fertilisers used for agricultural ingredients account for about 15 per cent of total emissions from beer supply chains and 35-40 per cent for bread, according to industry experts.

Nitrogen-based fertiliser and farm manure make up 5 per cent of global greenhouse gas emissions, producing 2.6bn tonnes of CO₂ a year, more than global aviation and shipping combined, according to research published by the journal Nature Food.

Original article.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] garyo 2 points 11 months ago

Biggest process-related emissions (i.e. not energy production, transportation, heating etc.): steel, concrete, plastics, and fertilizer. Together they use about 17% of all energy generated. All industrial energy use is about 23% of the total. See https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/sources-greenhouse-gas-emissions

[–] oDDmON 1 points 11 months ago

That last sentence is rather jarring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Milorganite all over again

This stuff is great, but quantities that are available don't suffice to replace the Haber-Bosch process for production of nitrogen fertilizer.

The bigger plan is the use of green hydrogen as an input to fertilizer manufacture.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Um... Why do we need to produce fertilizer? Animals make poop pretty easily and compost just needs to be turned frequently to make something to help plants grow.

Seems to me maybe these companies could adopt regenerative farming techniques is they are really concerned.

[–] fpslem 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Animal husbandry is a challenge in and of itself, introduces additional disease vectors, and has a carbon load of its own.

I have composted for a garden for 7 years now, and I have found that I still have to add nitrogen sources and a few other things like bone meal to get productive soil, even with pretty extensive composting. There are probably better composting methods, I'm not an expert, but compost is no silver bullet even at the small scale.

And the scale of commercial farming is mind-blowing, I really don't know what kind of techniques can be used at scale.

[–] drhugsymcfur 0 points 11 months ago

You cannot feed 8 billion people with the arable land that we have available without synthetic fertilizer.

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/world-population-with-and-without-fertilizer

Even if we were to Thanos snap the world population and feed those people with only compost/manure/night soil, a large percentage of the labor force would need to go into food production, and cheap food would no longer be a possibility.

Farmers are using all the manure that they have available in the most efficient manner that the market will bear right now and even then I don't know about any for profit farmer in my extension office who doesn't use additional synthetic fertilizer.