Linux

48338 readers

1909 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

X11 vs Wayland (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

62 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm a seasoned Linux user, but mostly for servers and services, not really for desktop use.

I've dabbled in some desktop distros on my personal rig a few times in the past, but ultimately due to specific games, I've gone back to Windows.

I recently installed Arch and KDE. Upon initial boot I noticed it was defaulted to Wayland. Every time I would try to log in it would just go to a black screen then cycle back to the login screen. Picking X11 would bring me to the desktop.

Basic Specs:

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 3D
nVidia RTX 4090

I have been doing some reading into this and it looks like the issue is due to the proprietary nVidia drivers, but there are solutions to work around this.

I know nothing of Wayland other than its supposed to be more secure. My question is, is it worth the time/effort to get Wayland working? I primarily use my system for gaming. X11 seems to be working just fine for me right now.

Forgive me if I'm using some of the terminology wrong, still learning.

EDIT - Selling my gpu is not an option. I knew ahead of time that AMD has superior Linux support, but the 4090's performance can't be matched by anything AMD has. Maybe next upgrade I'll go back to AMD if they have the top performer.

(page 2) 9 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Last I heard of Wayland was when it was in Alpha stages. Didn't follow up since.

What has changed in Wayland since and how different is it to X11 ?

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Notmythrowaway6991 1 points 1 year ago

On my personal machine I run sway, at work I have to use Windows so I use i3 in a virtualbox vm. Sway/Wayland had performance and graphical issues for me

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I try to run Wayland if possible, otherwise I fall back to good ole X.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Void Linux user here. nVidia's Wayland support was shit a couple of months ago but it has been pretty good for a few months now. And they're really focusing on Wayland with each update. Sway is weird with nVidia, which they state openly. I have RTX 3060Ti and I'm using Wayfire. Steam is working pretty smoothly and I haven't had any problems gaming, so far (no AAA games, mind you, just CSGO, Hollow Knight, Subnautica etc.).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use a X11 due to my gpu a 1660 ti and my drivers which I need for gaming. Wayland only worked for me when I did not have nvidia drivers installed, so I had to move back to X11 after I installed my drivers, but for the short time I used wayland it was sufficient enough for my daily tasks when I was not gaming. I will be sticking with X11 until Wayland is stable enough for my nvidia gpu or when I buy a new pc and get a amd gpu.

load more comments