this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
4 points (70.0% liked)

Improve The News

473 readers
1 users here now

Improve The News is a free news aggregator and news analysis site developed by a group of researchers at MIT and elsewhere to improve your access to trustworthy news. Many website algorithms push you (for ad revenue) into a filter bubble by reinforcing the narratives you impulse-click on. By understanding other people’s arguments, you understand why they do what they do – and have a better chance of persuading them. **What's establishment bias?** The establishment view is what all big parties and powers agree on, which varies between countries and over time. For example, the old establishment view that women shouldn’t be allowed to vote was successfully challenged. ITN makes it easy for you to compare the perspectives of the pro-establishment mainstream media with those of smaller establishment-critical news outlets that you won’t find in most other news aggregators. This Magazine/Community is not affiliated with Improve The News and is an unofficial repository of the information posted there.


**LR (left/right): 1 = left leaning, 3 = neutral, 5 = right leaning** **CP (critical/pro-establishment): 1 = critical, 3 = neutral, 5 = pro**

founded 1 year ago
 
  • The US House of Representatives voted Wednesday along party lines 221-212 to formalize an impeachment inquiry into Democratic Pres. Joe Biden, following Republican allegations that Biden and his family have taken part in an "influence peddling" scheme with foreign entities for financial gain. NPR Online News (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • While focusing on the president, Republicans have also used their inquiry to look into his son, Hunter Biden, and overseas business deals that they claim may have benefited the elder Biden. Associated Press (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • The impeachment probe was opened in September by then-House Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) without a formal vote. USA Today (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • By formalizing the probe, Republicans hope they’ll have more success obtaining information from the White House, which in turn says it has cooperated fully with the investigation. USA Today (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • This came the same day the Hunter Biden — who claims that his father had no involvement in his business dealings — defied a House committee subpoena for a closed-door deposition, saying he would only provide his testimony publicly. Reuters (LR: 3 CP: 5)
  • Meanwhile, the White House issued a statement from Biden saying Congress needs to "take action on important priorities for the nation and world" rather than focusing on a "baseless political stunt ... not supported by facts." The White House

Republican narrative:

  • A political victory for Speaker Mike Johnson and House Republicans, investigations into the Bidens' dodgy business dealings are about uncovering the truth. Although Biden might not ultimately be impeached, it’s still important to follow the evidence to the end and inform the American electorate of Biden's true nature prior to the next year's presidential election.
    National Review (LR: 5 CP: 5)

Democratic narrative:

  • Instead of addressing Americans’ concerns on issues of real substance, House Republicans are going on a wild goose chase without any evidence. If they truly wished to deliver meaningful good, they would stop prioritizing this sham over passing much-needed legislation. This impeachment vote merely reaffirms that Republicans are not fit to govern public office.
    Los Angeles Times

Cynical narrative:

  • As seen with former Pres. Trump in 2019, and now with Pres. Biden, the possibility of impeachment – once the heavyweight of public office discipline – has become a fickle and arbitrary threat used by both sides of the political spectrum. For such a tool to be abused by both Republicans and Democrats is embarrassing and highlights how low American politics has fallen in recent years.
    The Washington Times

Nerd narrative:

  • There's a 25% chance that Biden will be impeached by the House, according to the Metaculus prediction community.
    Metaculus (LR: 3 CP: 3)
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Poayjay 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Normally, these provide an interesting and rational take on events but this one is awful. The democratic narrative of “what about these issues” is crap. Launching baseless investigations in election years to influence elections is a disgusting abuse of power. That’s the democratic narrative.

The republican narrative of them following evidence is also crap. There is no evidence of wrongdoing by Biden. Saying they are following evidence implies there is evidence to follow.

The cynical narrative of “both sides” is also crap. Clear evidence of coercing of our allies for political gain and leading a literal insurrection completely justify impeachment. Implying the democrats used those impeachments as a political theater is painfully disingenuous.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 2 points 1 year ago

Excellent analysis, good points. I’m tired of this circus.

[–] BloodSlut 1 points 1 year ago

I gotta disagree about how these articles are normally rational.

More than half the time its like:

·Democrat narrative: Something totally boring, sometimes pro-corporate, sometimes progressive, sometimes a pretty bad take.

·Republican Narrative: Something that only could have come out of a crack pipe. Sometimes not even a narrative and just some random internet person's conspiracy theory.

Also the "establishment-critical" and "pro-establishment" views are often pretty laughable. There's been multiple times I've seen "establishment-critical" statements that are unabashedly pro-establishment. But i think thats just whoever writes these articles confusing "establishment" with "incumbent"

[–] eran_morad 3 points 1 year ago

Impeach deez nuts

[–] NightAuthor 1 points 1 year ago

Interesting format