this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2023
50 points (87.9% liked)

Forgotten Weapons

1638 readers
3 users here now

This is a community dedicated to discussion around historical arms, mechanically unique arms, and Ian McCollum's Forgotten Weapons content. Posts requesting an identification of a particular gun (or other arm) are welcome.

https://www.youtube.com/@ForgottenWeapons

https://www.forgottenweapons.com/

Rules:

1) Treat Others in a Civil Manner. This is not the place to deride others for their race, sexuality, or etc. Personal insults of other members are not welcome here. Neither are calls for violence.

2) No Contemporary Politics Historical politics that influenced designs or adoption of designs are excluded from this rule. Acknowledgement of existing laws to explain designs is also permissable, so long as comments aren't in made to advocate or oppose a policy. Let's not make this a place where we battle over which color ties our politicians should have, or the issues of today.

3) No Advertising This rule doesn't apply to posting historical advertisements or showing more contemporary ads as a means of displaying information on an appropriate topic. The aim of this rule is to combat spam/irrelevant advertising campaigns.

4) Keep Post on Topic This rule will be enforced with leeway. Just keep it related to arms or Forgotten Weapons or closely adjacent content. If you feel you have something that's worth posting here that isn't about either of those (and doesn't violate other rules) feel free to reach out to a mod.

5) No NSFW Content Please refrain from posting uncensored extreme gore or sexualized content. If censored these posts may be fine.

Post Guide Lines

These are suggestions not rules.

-Provide a duration for videos. eg. [12:34]

-Provide a year to either indicate when a specific design was produced, patented, or released. If you have an older design being used in a recent conflict provide the year the picture was taken. Dates should be included to help contextualize, not necessarily give exact periods.

-Post a full URL, on mobile devices it can be hard to tell what you're clicking on if you only see "(Link)".

-Posts do not have to be just firearms. Blades, bows, etc. are also welcome.

Adjacent Communities

If you run a community that you feel might fit in dm a mod and we might add your's.

Want to Find a Museum Near You? Check out the mega thread: https://lemmy.world/post/9699481

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Despite the name this cartridge was invented by P.O. Ackley a prolific American wildcatter. Wildcat cartridges are ones that are not made to a standard adopted by any major manufacturer.

This particular cartridge could send a .22 caliber round 5,000 fps (1,524 m/s). The case it uses in this picture is that of a .378 Weatherby Magnum necked down to hold a .223 caliber bullet, but another design of the same name used .50 BMG cases.

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] FireTower 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Good eye. Just fixed it.

For anyone curious the title had "it's" instead of the correct "its".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Perfect for when you want to spray a fine lead mist at someone with extreme speed

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Shooting .22 out of .378 barrel doesn't seem like the path to accuracy.

[–] babboa 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thats not what's happening though. The Casing is a .378 case but the neck of the case (which holds the bullet in place) is formed down to .223. The barrel is also presumed to be .223 diameter with a chamber that is reamed out to accommodate the length and diameter of the cartridge to be fired. It's a path to putting a ton of powder behind a small diameter bullet (much like an even more extreme version some more modern calibers like 6.5-300 weatherby magnum). Actually with a little work (and some very long and heavy .223 diameter bullets) you could probably make this thing hilariously accurate for a thousand rounds or so before you absolutely wrecked the rifling.

[–] FireTower 2 points 11 months ago

Actually with a little work (and some very long and heavy .223 diameter bullets) you could probably make this thing hilariously accurate for a thousand rounds or so before you absolutely wrecked the rifling.

I agree. Every round would be hand loaded (because no company loads it). And precision is nothing more than repeatability. If you've found a good action and barrel nothing should stop you from shooting sub MOA groups.

For the most part particular chamberings are only more or less 'accurate' based on the ballistic coefficient / drop and the standard at which the manufacturer makes the cartridges.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Probably had a horrible barrel lifespan since the burn time for that powder is going to be super long and the flame is getting focused down to .223in.

A good rule of thumb is to use slower powders for bigger cartridges and heavier bullets, but this design kinda breaks that rule on a number of levels. To slow a powder burn and you are spraying powder. To fast, and you are basically building a grenade.