Direct link to AP news. Same article, no paywall
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-385ec911ce0ca2f415966078eddb66da
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
Direct link to AP news. Same article, no paywall
https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-gay-rights-lgbtq-website-385ec911ce0ca2f415966078eddb66da
The guy isn't even gay and is married. This shit better get repealed.
This certainly feels on brand.
We really need to get these supreme court stooges out of there yesterday
The article is paywalled.
huh... just a fully fake case? none of the things that the case is about happened?
Yep. Not one thing in the filing actually happened. The Supreme court should never have heard the case.
Shoot there’s a paywall what does the article say?
I think Lorrie Smith’s (lack of) reputable credibility precludes any thinking person hiring her services.