this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
29 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy.World Announcements

29032 readers
7 users here now

This Community is intended for posts about the Lemmy.world server by the admins.

Follow us for server news ๐Ÿ˜

Outages ๐Ÿ”ฅ

https://status.lemmy.world

For support with issues at Lemmy.world, go to the Lemmy.world Support community.

Support e-mail

Any support requests are best sent to [email protected] e-mail.

Report contact

Donations ๐Ÿ’—

If you would like to make a donation to support the cost of running this platform, please do so at the following donation URLs.

If you can, please use / switch to Ko-Fi, it has the lowest fees for us

Ko-Fi (Donate)

Bunq (Donate)

Open Collective backers and sponsors

Patreon

Join the team

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I canโ€™t find anyone talking about it (or maybe searching here isnโ€™t my forte yet).

What do you think about it?

all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Ahmed 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I prefer the old one, 2000s WEB nostalgia.

[โ€“] unchanged3152 4 points 1 year ago

New one looks a bit messy :(

[โ€“] ORO8ORO 8 points 1 year ago

I've made a post just yesterday with some suggestions xD But I guess they were already working on a new one, and the generic globe was just a placeholder.

The new one seems to follow the same style as their Mastodon.world logo.

I think it's better than the placeholder, but a bit hard to read maybe.

And I particularly would prefer if the Lemmy instances tried to follow a similar design rules (in the logo and overall site design, and if possible in their names/domains lol), so it have a consistent branding and look more visually appealing to possible new users.

[โ€“] ndr 8 points 1 year ago

I feel like the logo has potential, but right now it looks very โ€œgraphic design is my passionโ€. ๐Ÿ’€

[โ€“] TeaHands 7 points 1 year ago

We had a thread with some suggestions in yesterday but maybe Ruud decided all our suggestions were terrible and took matters into his own hands :D

[โ€“] odin 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the old one was a placeholder. The new one looks like the mastodon.world icons

[โ€“] TVPaulD 5 points 1 year ago

The lettering doesnโ€™t scale very well. I assume it worked better for Mastodon World being โ€œMW.โ€ With this being โ€œLWโ€ the same stylisation looks fairly awkward, especially when scaled down.

[โ€“] Zeus 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

i hate it.. : (

the old one looked really good; it had character and skeuomorphism and stood out in the instance list

the new one looks.. fine, i guess. it's there. i can't really say anything about it, apart from it's a bit dark and too busy, but it has nothing going for it

[โ€“] ndr 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the colors are a main problem, especially the lack of contrast dark blue + black.

Maybe some of it could be overlayed on a simplified globe?

[โ€“] Zeus 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

to be honest, it's the simplification that i dislike. it's so fucking corporate and soulless, it looks like somebody outsourced it to the cheapest bidder

i also think it is starting to look dated, as even corporations are moving back to designs with depth (look at the new edge logo and fluent design in general, or gnome circle apps)

[โ€“] ndr 2 points 1 year ago

A few look kind of nice, but for others I need c/eyebleach now.

Also, fuck Google and their impossible-to-tell-apart logos! Like, if you have a dozen of Google apps, you need to stop and think because there's nothing obvious now to identify them.

[โ€“] denton 4 points 1 year ago

Prefer it to the old one

[โ€“] sanguinepar 3 points 1 year ago

I like it, although it's a bit unclear when it's very small, eg as a favicon.

[โ€“] tallwookie 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

oh yeah, didnt it used to be a globe?

[โ€“] ndr 4 points 1 year ago
[โ€“] Gort 0 points 1 year ago

Sort of comes out as a smudge in a dark square when it's a favicon. Still, an improvement over the previous one.