Running

2592 readers

2 users here now

A place for runners.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

submitted 1 year ago by marvinfreeman to c/running

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I didn't know there was all that much difference in shoe foams.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] _wizard 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IMO, foam just benefits those that heelstrike. Course, I'm a toe runner, so I'm in a totally different camp.

[–] Hominine 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Is there not foam under the entire shoe? Is your heel not contacting the ground whatsoever during a given stride?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Ballet strats

[–] TeXitoi 0 points 1 year ago

The best energy return, most durable, and cheaper is no shoes! Infinite value for money!

[–] Brunbrun6766 0 points 1 year ago

Personally the moment I saw that a foam was described as "boring" I new this was bullshit opinion and not science