Environment

288 readers

1 users here now

Your definitive source for news, information, issues and activism related to the environment.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

d33pblu3g3n3

Motor emissions could have fallen by over 30% without SUV trend, report says (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 11 months ago by dantheclamman to c/environment

8 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 8 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] macrocephalic 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Basically people will decide the price they're willing to pay and will increase their "needs" until they hit that price. Cars have gotten much more efficient, so they've gotten bigger. This is the same effect you see with highways; as soon as you build a better road more people will use it (driving further and eschewing alternative transport) until the new road is just as crowded as the old one.

[–] dantheclamman 1 points 11 months ago

For me, it is obnoxious how few options there are to replace my 2013 Volt. I'd like a compact, nimble hybrid that doesn't drive like an appliance. The options are few, because that type of product isn't as profitable, it seems

[–] TropicalDingdong 5 points 11 months ago

Industry promoted versus trend?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Here's a better issue to pursue. From the same source, ironically:

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Please stop trotting out a six year old story in some weird attempt to say people bear no blame for the things they consume. Who do you think those companies are selling to?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 11 months ago (1 children)

My dude, the big question is what would have the biggest impact on slowing/stopping climate change. We are on a rapid decent and people recycling, using paper straws, or not buying SUVs sure as hell ain't gonna do much. It will help, but it is like throwing a snowball at a wildfire. If we don't deal with the biggest problem, the rate of climate damage will outpace the mitigation.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/05/single-use-plastic-chemical-recycling-disposal/661141/

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20231103-plastic-or-paper-the-truth-about-drinking-straws

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Why are you linking me to stuff about recycling and plastic straws that have little or nothing at all to do with carbon emissions or climate change?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Why is that your take away from that paragraph I typed out?