this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
67 points (97.2% liked)

NBA

5103 readers
13 users here now

East - Atlantic
Boston Celtics
Brooklyn Nets
New York Knicks
Philadelphia Sixers
Toronto Raptors
East - Central
Chicago Bulls
Cleveland Cavaliers
Detroit Pistons
Indiana Pacers
Milwaukee Bucks
East - Southeast
Atlanta Hawks
Charlotte Hornets
Miami Heat
Orlando Magic
Washington Wizards
West - Northwest
Denver Nuggets
Minnesota Timberwolves
Oklahoma City Thunder
Portland Trailblazers
Utah Jazz
West - Pacific
Golden State Warriors
Los Angeles Clippers
Los Angeles Lakers
Phoenix Suns
Sacramento Kings
West - Southwest
Dallas Mavericks
Houston Rockets
Memphis Grizzlies
New Orleans Pelicans
San Antonio Spurs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] silverbax 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really seems like the Warriors front office has derailed after so many years of solid moves.

[–] clothes 4 points 1 year ago

Especially with the player option. Though I suppose $25m will be a small contract four years from now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That's a longer term than I expected, i guess they think they can still win this season, maybe the one after.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Honestly reasonably contract both for Draymond and for the Warriors

[–] gon 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Free agent forward Draymond Green has agreed to a four-year, $100 million contract with a player option in the final season to re-sign with the Golden State Warriors on the first day of free agency, sources tell ESPN’s Andscape. Green, Stephen Curry & Klay Thompson stay together."

per Marc J. Spears, on Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

4 years with a player option is definitely a longer contract than I expected, Klutch putting in work

[–] manigault 2 points 1 year ago

You forgot to mention CEO OF KLUTCH SPORTS RICH PAUL

[–] Lanfordr 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I figured he was gone after the shit with Poole. I know Poole is gone, but I figured they wouldn't want that toxicity on the team any more.

[–] ConditionOverload 5 points 1 year ago

Figured it was kind of a legacy contract, plus he's still a very smart player on the court and an incredible defender+decent playmaker. He also knows Kerr's system inside and out. I can see why they did this.

[–] Lanfordr 3 points 1 year ago

I figured he was gone after the shit with Poole. I know Poole is gone, but I figured they wouldn't want that toxicity on the team any more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting. There was a a lot of speculation going around that he’s leave the dubs.

[–] Boondock 2 points 1 year ago

I appreciate teams rewarding loyalty but it sort of feels like an overpay on the backend to me. He's 33 now and not exactly a player known for peak fitness.

This salary puts him in top 60 highest paid at the moment. I know cap will go up and he'll drop on this list but still we might look at the last 2 years of this contract as an anchor killing their ability to compete.