Fortunately, this is mitigated by not using Chrome.
this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
263 points (93.7% liked)
Technology
59703 readers
5170 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
"Security", haha yeah right
The security of their cash flow.
Literally my reaction when I saw that.
they obviously mean their financial security.
The security of their profits
load more comments
(7 replies)
My ad blocker is part of my security.
Not your security, silly. Their security (financial).
Some speculate this is an intentional move by Google due to suspected loss of ad-revenue. We don’t know
Oh, we know. It may technically qualify as speculation, but we know.
This reads like "gun makers softens triggers on guns to improve gun safety" or "baby formula makers poison baby food to build up babies' tolerance to poisoned baby food"
The FBI recommends that everyone use an adblocker as part of their basic security toolkit.
If your browser vendor has a problem with that, switch to a different browser.
I was about to comment on this, but my Android phone spontaneously rebooted.
Anyway. Before I was so rudely interrupted, I was about to say: Firefox. It is a thing. An awesome thing.
By sheer coincidence I am sure, YouTube (a Google subsidiary) just started "accidentally" degrading their performance on Firefox but not Chrome.
Totally reads like an Onion headline.
Yeah, malware is often distributed via ads. They also track+expose information that could be used for spear phishing, identity theft and so on, if it falls into the wrong hands. So, ad blocking is certainly recommended for security.
It's funny. Seeing this post was the catalyst for me to finally set Firefox as the default browser on my phone and start using it daily. Going to set it up on my work laptop tomorrow too.
Ad blockers: 1, Google: 0
Wtf is with the headline. We all know that is untrue - it's about Mr Do-no-evil's bottom line.
load more comments
(1 replies)
What a messed up title.
The one and only reason they are doing this is to boost ad revenue.
That they even mention the word "security" in this is a farce.
It's still as insecure as ever, since a malicious plugin can simply spy on and report on your usage.
They meant their (financial) security, not ours.
Good thing I handle all that at the router!
Not same domain ads.
Yeah it doesn't get everything, but it gets the vast majority of stuff and I'm ok with that. I've been working hard at pulling down the videos I want from YouTube and uploading them to my peertube instance so I don't need to use YouTube directly anymore most of the time.
load more comments
(7 replies)
a little tweak of title:
"Google to weaken adblockers on Chrome in a push for ad revenue security."
"We wanna weaken ad blockers because ~~we like money~~ of security."
Whenever Google or Apple do something that affects your experience in the name of security then.... RUN
I will NEVER touch Chrome. If I MUST I will use Chromium once in a long ass while. Otherwise, fuck off your bullshit spying CIA/FBI/etc. website.
Does this make the company look good or bad? Does this hurt or help their brand?
They need to fix google search. Relevant results are the keywords.
view more: next ›