this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
55 points (88.7% liked)

Mander

39 readers
5 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It has blatant homophobia, transphobia, racism, vaccine anti-science misinformation, etc. What is mander stand on this?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TragicNotCute 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For what it’s worth, Lemmy.world defederated with them a few days ago. I feel like it was a good move.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It looks like sh.itjust.works is going to as well

Edit: I am having issues with Jerboa, and don't seem to able to link the OP, Here is one of the comments (which should take you to the OP). Currently 314 comments about it.

Edit: we are voting on it, Here is an exploding.heads user voting against defederation

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This leads me to a Linux discussion about Wayland. I think this has happened before, at least in Jerboa. Wonder if the comment IDs time out and get assigned to a different one?

Edit: Okay I opened it in the browser and now I can see what you meant to link.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I want to know too. It's time for this instance to establish some basic moral framework.

Open discussion and interaction for the purpose of exchanging ideas and learning from one another is essential, and that only happens in an environment where people feel encouraged and safe. (The word safe can be a trigger for some and is often misinterpreted, so let me narrow the definition to the sense that you feel in control over your own well-being so that you can push your comfort zone on your own terms and grow as a person without having your comfort zone invaded and vandalised).

If people are made to feel discouraged and unsafe by a foul atmosphere and repeated exposure to content/interactions that degrade their health in any way (directly or indirectly; short term or long term), they will not benefit from any supposed openness or freedoms.

Whether some content technically breaks any explicit rules or not is inconsequential to the impact it has on the well-being of a community, so I don't want to see this place moderated under some false pretence of impartiality. Just keep it tidy and healthy so that we can focus on what we're all here for. If someone wants to go swimming with the sharks they can very well do so on some free speech instance. We all know what those are like. And there is a reason they end up that way.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

kbin.social and lemmy.world defederated from exploding-heads a few days ago. I went there once and the whole site looks like /r/the_donald before it was banned. Full of propaganda and lies, misinformation. anti-vax nonsense, election disinformation. Good riddance.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not from your instance, but I share the following information regarding how other instances feel regarding EH.
https://fba.ryona.agency/?domain=exploding-heads.com

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

when your instance defederated list becomes a reasonable map of the fediverse you know you fucked up

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Lmao they even have other Fediverse platform servers blocking them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is a relevant podcast episode by Sean Carroll (includes transcript). He identifies as an intellectual who is interested in open, rational debate, and gives some considered thoughts on how to balance moral principles like free speech vs people's well-being. If you have time and interest, I can recommend it (and his podcast in general).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Ooo thanks for this! I just came here to lurk this servers decision on exploding heads, but I got a cool podcast link!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (20 children)

I prefer to deal with content in a case-by-case basis, and de-federation from an instance would be the very last-resort strategy. I want users to have the freedom to choose what they interact with. Today it's exploding-heads, soon it will be Meta, then some might want to defederate from lemmygrad, and after that something else.

My position is to resist de-federation. To defederate I would need to have seen that the users asking for defederation have made an effort not to engage with the content by blocking communities and reporting offending users/content who post to our communities, and the scale of the problem must be so significant that I can no longer deal with it manually. As of today, I have received zero reports of exploding-heads.

I have looked at the communities, and I can see that we have fetched content from the following communities:

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

[email protected]

It is only five communities, and my suggestion is to block them if you find their content offensive. I hope that users will soon be able to block instances themselves.

If this is a deal-breaker, defederating with problematic instances is a very common position in the fediverse, and it will be easy to find an instance that blocks them.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

It may not be wise to wait and watch with this one. Part of the reason people are leaving Reddit like myself is we do not want to deal with this anymore. These do not argue in good faith. They will eventually brigade us with the next controversy. I suggest asking your users and listening on this one. This is not a safe place unless defended, that sometimes means being proactive. Consider this my report as well.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

You are shifting responsibility of moderation onto users. What you should be doing for all of us, you are asking us to do ourselves. Each of us would have to moderate the same content, and with fewer tools to do it. Massive duplication of effort and needless exposure to harmful content (or perhaps you find value in that type of content?).

If this is your stance and you are done thinking about this, I mourn what this instance might have been.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't reported because I don't even know how to. Consider this my report.

But this seems like a big inconsistence. Did you even see the posts? How's that for a case-by-case basis? What is a case bad enough? If this doesn't do it, I don't know what would.

It's a shame, it was such a nice instance for science topics. But the admin makes the instance. I will move elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

just fyi there should be a report button under the post or comment when you click the 'more' menu (looks like 3 dots) and then the button that looks like a flag.

This is on lemmy, might be slightly different on kbin

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Technical question: while the instance is federated, its users can post here, right? Do you have any moderating tools that allow you to monitor incoming comments from users from a "fishy" instance as they come in?

My fear is that they have not accumulated enough of a mass of users yet, and enough of an interest in a "small" platform like Lemmy yet, but that the crowd will come once Lemmy becomes an established platform, which will make real infiltration efforts worthwhile.

And then we'll have to deal with the usual tactics: brigades organized offsite (on discord, telegram..) to drop on anything trans/immigration/etc. related like a plague of locusts. Teams of users posturing as the "sane one" and "crazy one" allowing the "sane" actor to push far-right points that "make sense" next to pure extremism. Threats sent as PMs to individual users. Doxxing, online stalking. And, behind that, their host doing nothing to prevent- or facilitating - the behavior.

I'm fine with you not taking action for now, but would you be ready to drop the hammer if they become problematic and user-level blocking of instances is not yet a thing?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, I'm with you on this. I will probably go back to lurking* if this is how it is because I do not want a target on my head as a proactive poster. I would have instance blocked them ages ago, but Lemmy in its current state leaves us unable to defend ourselves in this way. By the time that hammer is dropped if it does, the targets will already have been made. Hell, I grew up in a place where a lot of these people come from and I left there too for a reason. We cannot build and be proactive if our base is undefended.

*If I start seeing it.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're such an active user that at the beginning I thought it was your instance, and your presence here makes this place very active and interesting. I agree it'd be quite easy to associate you with mander as one and the same.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I used to revive old subs on reddit but they didn't get much traction and mostly ended up just arguing with anti-climate people and it sucked and made me unhappy so I stopped. I want to help spaces like this and invite others to, but not at the expense of exposure to harm.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I also thought it was your instance because you are so active, and, at that point I’m really enjoying the content you are posting. If you end up creating your own instance dedicated to science, with moderation for the anti-science harmful stuff I will follow you there! Just let me know

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wish I had the money and time right now to do so! :) Trying to limit my projects otherwise I overload myself. I'll continue posting because my brain loves filing things for whatever reason, but I will protect myself if I need to.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s fair, it’s the same reason I’m not making an instance also: time and money (we’ll mainly time). If you end up moving and trying to rebuild it somewhere just let me know!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, that sounds really demoralizing. :( I don't know how you did it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didn't. I stopped. I'm saying this as a warning because this place has potential and it would be a shame to stop it's momentum. People won't put up with it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I'll keep going, here, by the way as I have time (a bit ill today) but if I get the ick again I'll need to bounce as I've been making my brain a priority. I still mod those Reddit subs and they just get spam these days.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was on Lemmy two years ago (or something like that), and I ultimately left because of the gore brigading that kept happening. Mods were unable to control it. Wasn't that a thing on Mander as well?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

We haven't had anyone using Mander as their home base in a brigade yet, fortunately, and it would be nice if it stays that way. But I do remember multiple brigades, and I do not think that we are much better prepared today than we were back then in terms of the tools that we have to detect these before our users see them.

The users were being created in many instances, mainly lemmy.ml and new instances that were created for the brigades. Around then was when lemmy introduced the application for registering and recommended others to implement them too.

Defederating is not very effective against a brigade because new instances can be spun-up quickly. White-list federation with instances that have an application is a more effective strategy, but with white list federation you cut out every new person who wants to join the fediverse from their small instance. If an instance is used to brigade, I'll block it until the admin can get things under control (if ever), and then unblock it. It's as simple as that.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I echo the sentiment that we should not take a wait and see approach to bigotry and anti-science sentiment. We should defederate proactively.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I disagree with defederation when it's due to non-illegal discussion, but I feel Lemmy (and kbin) should have more sane defaults. In a perfect world, no one would defederate but there would only be a whitelist of federated defaults on the main page for each instance so you have to actively go looking for the content in order to see it.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I expect things may be a little chaotic over the coming weeks and months.

I'm used to having people or memes I strongly disagree with on my feeds, I'm less used to AI porn on my feed....it's come a long way since Leisure Suit Larry.

Reddit had plenty blatant transphobia, racism, misinformation, antivax stuff etc. But generally outwith particular subreddits it was mocked, argued against, downvoted, removed or users banned. This seems more like r/Science blocking everyone from r/Conservative.

There is rapid growth and communities are being stress tested with far more than just an increase in bandwidth.

As the Lemmy code improves and more 3rd party tools are made available, tailoring Lemmy feeds for the individual should become easier to mod and manage without server sized banhammers.

In the mean time I'm prepared to tolerate some chaos, porn and shit posting....and also understand if instances feel defederating others is the best course of action in the mean time.

Switching between instances is super easy in Jerboa or in browser and whilst this instance is the best I've found I will be keeping an eye on things from a few vantage points.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mind you, there were subreddits that employed this technique of banning users subscribed or active in other communities they didn't like or approved of. So I guess that would be nothing new. I just wish there was a user-side way to block, at the very least the content coming from instances you don't want to follow. But then you could be still engaged by the users coming from these instances. Then again there are ass hats everywhere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blocking people for subscribing or participating in certain communities was the most childish part of spezland. It seemed like a esclating war of control rather than a forum for communication. Good riddens!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It was a general filter, one that isn't necessarily just, but sometimes needed to lessen the amount of moderation needed to do. I'm talking about when it was actually used to protect community and not because of personal grudges or for silly wars between subreddits

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›