this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
190 points (96.6% liked)

science

14880 readers
15 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sources & relevant Wikipedia articles: 2023 in science. Stay up to date with the latest major studies.

I also integrate most of the studies into Wikipedia; finding, editing & selection take most of the time, not the image. Monthly newsletter is here (I don't know if it still sends the mails properly).

I used to put all the sources here; here's the sources for only the six main items:

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] doyadig 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is awesome. How do I subscribe to these posts only?

[–] prototyperspective 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you! You can get notified via a monthly email. Let me know if they land in the spam-folder, I don't know if they do or did.

[–] doyadig 4 points 1 year ago

Hell Yeah. Great. Just subscribed. III let you know if they end up in junk folder.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Love these posts.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

That’s a great overview

[–] Yokozuna 4 points 1 year ago

Love to read the info, but also hate the info - the one about oxygen content in rivers is particularly terrible :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do I subscribe to these posts? I don't mind seeing everything proto does, but I can't find a way to even follow the user.

Like, subscribe, ring the bell

[–] prototyperspective 2 points 1 year ago

Glad you liked it and ask about it: you can get notified via the monthly email, see the newsletter link above.

[–] FunnyUsername 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What are the six main entries?

Am i really supposed to click 6 unlabeled urls looking for one thing i want from a list of 10 things? I mean thanks for trying, but pretty useless.

[–] Serinus 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's a better way to phrase this.

But it's true, proper citations shouldn't be much of a stretch from what he's already doing. Presumably none of this is off the top of his head.

Not for this one, of course, but it'd be nice to see going forward.

Maybe it could be designed as front and back of a card as two images. In some places the second image could be included as a comment.

[–] prototyperspective 2 points 1 year ago

They are sorted by order of appearance; it's just 4 links and the two additional ones are the short items of the tile's image.