this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2023
86 points (93.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43776 readers
1273 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Odelay42 126 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Trans rights are human rights

Gay rights are human rights

Black peoples rights are human rights

Women's rights are human rights

Human rights exist.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (1 children)

These will still get you cancelled in 2023 in some countries.

[–] Odelay42 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conversely, there were countries even back then that supported all these things. The Iroquois Confederacy was famous for giving women virtually all the power (except for running for office), and Japan had LGBT accomodations (and interracial respect, albeit with some skepticism) going back centuries.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the history I want to learn more about!!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anything that is embracing diversity/women's rights/trans rights/etc. Sounds like a really interesting culture.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There are other places that come close to those. For example, the ancient Greeks had LGBT acceptance, as ordained by the gods, albeit from a very male-centric point of view. Nevertheless, Iroquois history is what you'll find fulfills that, and as someone who has been exposed to their culture for a while, I can offer a bit of insight.

The rulers, which always ruled in consensus groups of five or six, were always male, as was three out of four of the founders of their government (Deganawida, Hiawatha, Atotarho, and Jigonsasee who was the female whose idea it was), but the voters (because it was a democracy that surpassed any other democratically) were always female, and most rights centered around us, including divorce (a woman could simply walk out of a household if she wanted), and goddesses took center stage.

They even went so far as to say civilization was founded once before Deganawida founded it, by a female founder called Godasiyo, but her pet doggo caused a civil war as doggos do, and after her last ditch attempts at saving the kingdom failed, she turned into a fish in shame.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

interracial respect

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks Pipey.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Trans isn't a word. Everyone has a right to be gay, jolly and happy or whatever synonym you want to use."

  • someone from 1823, when "gay" meant "cheerful".
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe he means trans-Atlantic rights?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I say there can be no justice, so long as the sodomites are not allowed to practice love as they will!"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Poland, Warsaw (then had separate legal systems), The Netherlands, Bavaria, the Dominican Republic and El Salvador all decriminalized same sex relationships in the 1810s and 20s. So it wasn't exactly all completely dead-against.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

"If I could but play the advocate of the devil's for but a moment; does not an educated person, who hast accrued more whelth, hencewheretofore demonstrated a more explicit display of personhood?"

  • an edgelord/temporarily embarrassed thousand-aire of the time, probably.
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago (2 children)

1923 - "we need to scrap the harshest measures of the treaty of versailles and help Germany's economic recovery, otherwise these national socialists are going to exploit the misery to gain power" lol

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

That wouldn't get you cancelled, that was basically the position of the US government which led to the Dawes Plan in 1924 to do exactly that. The impact of Versailles in the rise of the Nazis wasn't so much economic, by 1924 Germany was probably saving more by not being allowed to have a large army than it was losing to reparations, and the period of 1924-1929 was even called the Golden Twenties. The humiliation factor of how it was negotiated and imposed however played right into Hitler's hands.

[–] MindSkipperBro12 2 points 1 year ago

That or gut them much harder

[–] Notorious 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Idk about 1923, but in 1823 you would definitely get "canceled" for saying that washing your hands is good for your health.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

"Hah! Germ theory? Preposterous! I should think these 'germs' no more real than the tooth fairy. Why should the patient sit in their agony while you rinse your hands when there is surgery to perform? Why, it's downright disrespectful, wasting the patient's time like that, as if you care more for the tidiness of your person than their well-being. I should hope that no poor, beleaguered soul has the misfortune to find themselves under your care"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's a shame how they railroaded him into the poor house for such ideas. Sometimes being first is the worst to be.

[–] AnalogyAddict 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

1823: we should let the Indians have their land

1923: we really need to go over to Europe and stop that Hitler guy

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)

1923 is a little premature. He wasn’t appointed Chancellor of Germany until 10 years after that. Hitler was actually in prison in 1923 for attempting a coup, so it wouldn’t have been too upsetting to say you were against him.

[–] AnalogyAddict 6 points 1 year ago

It wouldn't have been Hitler that would have gotten you canceled. It would have been suggesting we go get involved in another war so soon after WWI with no real evidence that it would be important.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

However later on there was more support even among Americans with the US Nazi party that existed and tried to run in elections.

To be fair many around the world saw Fascism as a new exciting way to run a country until war broke out. Then those Nazis and fascists were only good when they were dead.

I wonder if those cosplaying as Nazis today understand they aren't the heroes they think they are especially when it comes to US WW2 veterans, (many would consider the real heroes) would want these newer Nazis dead too.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hitler was always criticized. There's a NYT report calling him out as an antisemite in the 1920's and Casablanca looked down on Nazis almost a decade before the first signs were showing of the holocaust to come.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

There's a NYT report calling him out as an antisemite in the 1920's

Sure, but this was at a time where you could get antisemitic magazines delivered to your door, and some people had dozens. There really wasn't as much stigma on it as now (And I'd argue it could use a little more stigma still). There were lots of places around the world where you could discuss the latest details of antisemitism with your hairdresser, and it wouldn't even be that weird.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I'm not saying there was stigma on it, I'm only saying it wasn't some alien idea that, just maybe, the Hitler guy might be shady.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

The Dearborn Independent from Henry Ford was one of the most wildly distributed papers of its time due to the Ford dealer network and how Ford was lauded as a the hero that brought the car to rural folk giving them freedom.

It's unfortunate that his antisemitic views were often the main things one would find in his paper that many would have just accepted as fact. Ford a brilliant man in many ways but this was one of the few ways in which he wasn't.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There really wasn’t as much stigma on it as now (And I’d argue it could use a little more stigma still).

Any criticism of Israel is met with cries of "antisemitism!" so I think we have enough stigma.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That’s not stigma that’s false positive identification

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is Casablanca? Or do you mean the film?

The play that the movie was based on was written in 1940.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Now you have me second-guessing, I know there was a classic movie where the characters jab at Nazis before what they were known for came to light. I'll edit it in when I think of it.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

In both eras, colonialism and militarism were still going on, and even though many powers condemned these two things, if we rule out things that weren't obvious like being a murderer, you could bet on supporting desertion and draft dodging getting you cancelled in all countries. This is literally how Red Badge of Courage starts.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

All of them?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Liking femboys