this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2023
42 points (90.4% liked)

Asklemmy

44672 readers
1321 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'll preface this by saying that English is not my mother language and I'm sorry if this isn't the right community, but I didn't find a more appropriate one.

Last year I started to notice more and more people on YouTube for example using the verb "to put" without a preposition -- like "Now I put the cheese" -- which sounds very weird and kind of feels wrong to me. Is this really used in spoken English and is it grammatically correct?

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

It's slangy, for sure. It's said in a way where the rest of the sentence is not explicitly stated but implied. Like, "Now I put the cheese... " (On the burger), and then I put the bun. (Again, on the burger.) It's not terribly uncommon, but it does happen.

[โ€“] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

No for most people because "put" would require two complements - the object and the place. (It's a lot like a ditransitive verb, even not being one.) And in this case the place is missing, you'd expect it to be at most replaced with an adverb (e.g. "now I put the cheese there").

[โ€“] MigratingtoLemmy 19 points 1 year ago

You'd say "Now I put the cheese in" or "there" or something of the like

[โ€“] marron12 17 points 1 year ago

It's colloquial and you'll hear it when people talk about making food. Like if you're making a sandwich. You put mayo on the bread, then you put the cheese, then you add meat and lettuce or whatever.

It's kind of like "on" is implied and you don't bother to say it. I just mentioned it, so I don't need to say it again. That's how it feels to me anyway.

I could see myself saying "First you put mayo, then you put cheese." That would be like if someone was standing next to me, watching me make the sandwich. They can see exactly where I'm putting things. But normally you do want to specify where you're putting something.

[โ€“] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

As a native English speaker it sounds strange to me. I have heard it used before by a fluent English speaker who was not a native speaker and it made sense, but caught me off guard at first.

It reminds me of how my French grandma would say "shut the lights" instead of "shut off the lights", or "shut the lights off". It makes enough sense to understand, but doesn't feel quite right.

[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The phrase that immediately comes to mind is "poner la mesa." It translates from Spanish as "to set the table" but literally means "to put the table." Similarly, one might take photos with a camera, but the literal meaning of the Spanish phrase "sacar photos" is "to remove photos."

Linguistically and colloquially (the latter lending more to your example of adding cheese to something), we often use weird verbs in specific contexts.

What you've described might not fall into the category of proper grammar, but it also doesn't come across as strange or unexpected.

There are also unspoken rules about the ordering of adjectives to ~~blindly follow~~ follow blindly.


Edit to add: Proper, verbose grammar is also not usually necessary or even useful in the context of directions/commands, particularly in lists of such. Sure, "add cheese" would probably make a technical writer happier, but the point still gets across.

The context is important as well:

"What toppings do you put on your burgers?"

"I put cheese."

[โ€“] grabyourmotherskeys 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have worked in a lot of kitchens where English was the standard language but different groups spoke Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, German, Swiss German, French, Arabic, Croatian, Tamil, etc. (not always the same time) and we just needed to work so the language was rudimentary and often literal translations.

"Put me three eggs" meaning "get me three eggs".

"I make it" meaning "I'll do it".

And so on.

"Close the fire" would be "turn off the burner".

I figured out at some point that "close" was like closing a switch. And that things like me, my, mine were not always easy for people. You'd hear "put me lettuce in fridge".

I want to be very clear I am not making fun of anyone. I sounded exactly the same when I was saying stuff in non-English (e.g. the garde manger were all Spanish at one place so they used it and when I worked their section I'd try to use it).

Edit - we talked like this outside of work too when having a beer "baby 3 now, get cake in morning, grows fast!". Good friends learn each others languages better but its mostly vocabulary and not grammar.

[โ€“] Zippit 2 points 1 year ago

It's like my mother, who pronounced a famous water brand wrong, so it actually turned into bring me 'bastard' water.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, it's definitely not grammatically correct.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"She wanted to put something in my butt."

Seems grammatical to me unless I'm not understanding the question well enough.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

@CmdrShepard I think OP is trying to talk about the word "put" without the "in" or "on" or "above" etc.

So it would just be "She put something".

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

It is often heard from non-native speakers and will probably be understood, but in the absence of other context it will be perceived as slightly odd. Perhaps it's on the way to being widely recognized as fully "correct" but I don't think it's there yet.

[โ€“] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have heard this before, mostly from people with English as a second language. It sounds a little odd to my ear and probably isn't technically correct, but like most things in English, if it makes sense in context you can let it slide.

[โ€“] Pothetato 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Plop the ham thusly, please

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In golf it can be used without preposition but also without object, and with completely unrelated meaning.

[โ€“] Mr_Blott 7 points 1 year ago

That's "putt" you plonker ๐Ÿ˜‚

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Not grammatically correct, (except in extremely specific circumstances) and common in ESL.

[โ€“] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's widely used, so I wouldn't draw some connotation from it.

Instructions can feature a fair amount of ellipsis: Put ham. Put cheese. Put bread.

Everybody knows it's ellipsis, and they'll be a little put out if you expect full sentences instead of rapid fire and terse instructions.

[โ€“] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sorry, but I don't think this is right. You'd say "add ham" not "put ham." "Put ham" doesn't mean anything without the preposition. "Put ham in/on"

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Add is just an operator. I'm not sure what the limits are to operators, but most English native speakers don't overthink it. (Or, they get overly concerned with their specific operator - which is no standard at all).

If they started with put, then it makes sense for put to follow.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Kraiden I agree with this.

@roo I'm really intrigued by what dialect of English you speak.