this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
37 points (80.3% liked)

Games

16653 readers
1104 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A new Genshin Impact web event has some great loot, but you're going to have to look at some terrifying AI animation.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Must be living a pretty sheltered life if this is "nightmare inducing"

[–] FMT99 7 points 1 year ago

Not to sound mean but it's people who spend their time on gacha games.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Clickbait title is clickbait. This is barely newsworthy.

[–] MysticKetchup 13 points 1 year ago

Give them a break guys, they're just a small indie company that doesn't have the money to pay animators to do an actually good job /s

Aside from how awful the animations are, I'm wondering why they felt they needed them at all. The little chibi portraits would have looked fine as static images

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I didn't even notice the little issues with the animation, I was just getting through it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It honestly looks almost alright.

[–] MisterLister 6 points 1 year ago

It looks like a newgrounds kid slapped it together after school in 2005

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Perfect back of the box quote, right there

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

It might look right in a new more iterations. A paper on their implementation would be cool.