submitted 7 months ago by [email protected] to c/world
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] [email protected] 31 points 7 months ago

Like... that kind of sucks... but I also love to see landlords denied clawing back security deposits for bullshit reasons.

Also, for an embassy building 900 bucks is fucking nothing.

[-] [email protected] 21 points 7 months ago

Imagine trying to stir anti-chinese sentiment over $900 that a landlord thinks they're owed. Laughable effort, really.

[-] Zehzin 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If anything, I respect that embassador more now.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago

Chandler said he would not rent property to embassies again.

“No more diplomats, and according to our property manager, that’s the advice he gives to others in the same area as well,” he told Stuff.

[-] lemmyAtom 4 points 7 months ago

This seems like they didn't stick around for the damage walk through or someusch rather than malicious damage.

But apparently that's a risk of the business:

In 2018, landlords were warned not to rent to diplomats after the deputy head of mission for the EU’s delegation in New Zealand, Eva Tvarozkova, was cleared from paying $20,000 to cover unpaid rent and damage to a property she rented in Wellington.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago

Show me a picture of the property after it was vacated. Sounds like the landlord is being a typical bastard. A landbastard if you will.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:

A landlord in New Zealand has run up against an unusual problem while trying to make his tenant pay $900 for rubbish removal: diplomatic immunity.

Chandler Investments Limited claimed its tenant, the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China, left a rented mews house in the capital, Wellington, without covering costs for cleaning, rubbish removal and key cutting.

Because renting a home was “incidental to the daily life of the diplomat” and profit was not being made from the arrangement, the exclusion was not upheld.

“I am not persuaded that the rental of a residential dwelling to an embassy would be commercial in nature, as the common law around diplomatic or sovereign immunity would consider it.”

Representatives of New Zealand’s foreign affairs and trade ministry were granted a right of appearance at the hearing, while neither of the parties in the dispute attended.

Tvarozkova was initially ordered to pay the money she owed to landlord, Matthew Ryan, but was later found to be exempted by diplomatic immunity.

The original article contains 485 words, the summary contains 167 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
38 points (85.2% liked)

World News

36679 readers
3258 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World


We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.


founded 11 months ago