this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
107 points (87.9% liked)

Gaming

20747 readers
207 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RightHandOfIkaros 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The bigger problem is that this game even had a battle pass and other monetization tactics at all.

Early Access games should never have a battle pass or cash item shop.

[–] pory 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

~~Early Access~~ games should never have a battle pass or cash item shop.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros 10 points 1 year ago

Yes, but especially Early Access games.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@RightHandOfIkaros @ylai Yeah, that article has the wrong takeaway from this.

The devs aren't heroes for removing the F2P elements. They never should have been there to begin with.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

True, but a lot of people never listen to the fact that they fucked up and they should do something about it. That fact alone deserves some kudos.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah that's right! Games like stardew valley, factorio, Terraria, Binding of Isaac, Hades and others could really learn from those brave heroes and finally remove the Battle pass and all the other payed content!

Edit: /s... Duh!

[–] WhyAUsername_1 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] WhyAUsername_1 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like an idiot.. c/woosh I guess, to myself.. 😂😂

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

No, none of these did. That's the joke.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A game that I never heard of is removing their battle pass, and monetization options. Ok?

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 1 points 1 year ago

Yep.

Pcgamesn as a website is pretty bottom of the barrel of gaming sites. And most indie games in general don't have any monetization either, yet no story for them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Good change, obviously. Monetizing cosmetics in this game has always struck me as odd. The game's not ugly, but it's not pretty enough to sell skins in my opinion.

If anyone's curious about the gameplay, Monster Train is a favorite deck builder of mine and Inkbound topped my list of games I was excited about. It exceeded my hopes and expectations and I can't think of anything else in the co-op space that comes close to the level of coordination and build variety found here. Great 1p as well and it's progressing beautifully in early access with some excellent redesigns on various systems and new classes.

[–] Sanctus 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not gonna lie, if everything is 1-5 dollars in the shop I dont care. Its when its in Alpha, has serious issues, and missing features, as well as having a microtransaction shop with 20+ dollar items that I get upset. Shit, even polished games like Destiny have predatory pricing. Digital items never have any real value, paying 30 bucks for armor skinz is deranged.