Buy it, give it a face-lift, add chat and then kill it, all within 2 years.
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
-15 points (14.3% liked)
Programming
16240 readers
67 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Google would buy it, pet it for 2 years and then take it out back and old-yeller it.
But not until after Google has used it to get every bit of personal data it has to get more dirt on you.
Google already tried doing code hosting once. It didn't work out.
Which they could have done a much better job with.
It was basically just hosted SVN if I remember right, and they never added git support when it became the de facto version control system.
Yeah, that's why it would be better for them to buy an existing solution. Google code looked bad, IIRC had some forced integration with google forums (or whatever they're called), and forced a google login. It didn't have a CI either. Gitlab has that and more.
They'd do what they are doing to android. Make it as unusable as possible without their proprietary crap.
Google is an advertising company. Something like 80% of their revenue comes from selling ads.
How would spending money on Gitlab support their primary business.
They're also one of the biggest clouds out there and their cloud has a git + CI offering (that sucks).
I don't trust Google or Microsoft for privacy and such stuff. But Microsoft does not give up as fast as Google.