this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
52 points (91.9% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

5229 readers
2 users here now

General discussion about movies and TV shows.


Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title's subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown as follows:

::: your spoiler warning
the crazy movie ending that no one saw coming!
:::

Your mods are here to help if you need any clarification!


Subcommunities: The Bear (FX) - [[email protected]](/c/thebear @lemmy.film)


Related communities: [email protected] [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago

I get they wanted to make the title punny. But in context, it's hard to tell if horrifying reviews, are good or bad for a horror movie.

[–] Ryan213 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is that a lot just for the rights? Sounds like a lot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

For a dead franchise like The Exorcist? Yup. But Universal also gets rights to use in theme parks and streaming, so they MIGHT make their money back.

That’s why you hear it’s a big gamble for this new trilogy of Exorcist movies.

[–] Sylver 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That really is a pretty big gamble. At $400m, they’re competing with some big name releases that made $500m

And I’m sure they’ll want more than just 100 in the green

[–] WaltJRimmer 15 points 1 year ago

$400m for the rights alone. It doesn't talk about cost of production.

Meaning they're looking to make that rights cost back across the trilogy rather than from one film, but they're constantly adding costs along the way.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The first film in a planned horror trilogy, Exorcist: Believer is getting rather poor reviews — scoring only a 28 22 20 percent average on Rotten Tomatoes.

Universal reportedly paid a head-spinning $400 million for the rights to the franchise in 2021, and Believer needs to generate enough momentum to help launch two more sequels.

Yet as producer Jason Blum pointed out to IndieWire in March, The Exorcist: Believer needs to generate some head-spinning box office returns.

“The riskiest movie I have ever made for sure is not out yet,” said Blum (M3GAN, Get Out, The Black Phone), who is regarded as the most prolific and successful horror hitmaker working today.

The film centers on Victor Fielding (Leslie Odom Jr.), whose daughter (Lidya Jewett) and her friend (Olivia Marcum) become possessed.

Yet neither title came close to the $30 million domestic opening weekend revenue that’s predicted for Believer and was scored by The Nun 2 — which received only a 52 percent rating on Rotten Tomatoes.


The original article contains 614 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 73%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] PelagiusSeptim 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Last paragraph makes no sense in the summary.

[–] Rylyshar 2 points 1 year ago

The ai summaries are pretty much worthless

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think the AI cares.

[–] PelagiusSeptim 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The person who runs the bot might.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure they're checking replies though

[–] PelagiusSeptim 3 points 1 year ago

No, I'm not sure either. I'd rather they get a reply if they do check them tho. Before I commented it had nothing but upvotes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I’m curious if this will sour the partnership between Blumhouse and Universal. The Halloween sequels didn’t do as good as 2018’s Halloween, and now this new Exorcist legacy sequel not meeting box office expectations.