this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
29 points (96.8% liked)

Steam Deck

14892 readers
605 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Just curious how Diablo 4 / battle.net performs after installation on the Steam Deck. Do I have to fiddle with settings after every update or once I go through the setup steps am I good to go?

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Setup and you're good to go. The game actually runs fantastically well on the Deck. Medium settings with FSR 2 Balanced drains 15W in dungeons and the open world, 23W in town. Hits a flat 40fps so if you frame limit in-game and set the Steam Deck to run in 40Hz mode, you get ultra smooth gameplay.

[–] jokes_on_you 4 points 1 year ago

Glad to hear, thanks!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

What are the controls like? I'm used to playing Diablo type games with mouse and keyboard. How does it translate over to game pad? Or do you run anything special with the track pad?

[–] imaBEES 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gamepad plays great! I’m actually much preferring it to mouse and keyboard for Diablo. It was designed for Xbox Series and PS5, so the controls are pretty intuitive. I prefer it because I can move my character with the stick rather than having to click around or hold the mouse down as I move

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which class do you recommend playing with for gamepad so it doesn't rely too much on auto locking or aiming?

[–] imaBEES 1 points 1 year ago

Hmm, I’ve only played Sorcerer so far, which kind of has some auto aiming by default as long as you’re aimed in the right direction (at least for shock spells, some others less so), but it feels right to me, not like it’s just hitting things without me trying

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have been playing Sorceress exclusively with a controller and it's working out great so far. I'm level 59 right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

it's pretty good. I have some gripes but overall diablo on controller is a good experience. d4 natively supports gamepad controls.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The game fully supports gamepads. Your basic skill and interact are mapped to A, core to X, skill 1 to Y, and the rest on LT, RT, and RB. LB is for potions. They're all remappable too, so you can configure how you like. Personally, I have basic and core on the triggers, and then the skills on my face buttons.

Honestly, it feels like playing a Gauntlet style game, feels very arcadey in a good way. The only downside is that if you're a caster, it's somewhat hard to aim your spells since you don't have a precise mouse cursor. This makes placing your hydras or your teleport destinations a little bit annoying. They're always placed at a constant distance away from you in the direction you're looking. For enemies, there's lock on targeting though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I played 2 and 3 with a mouse and keyboard wasn’t too sure getting into 4 on PS5 but overall it’s been a great experience. You can definitely tell they took the time to design this game for controller support.

My only qualm is occasionally I attack an npc while trying to target another.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Been playing since first beta exclusively on Steam Deck. No issues on SteamOS. I’ve clocked 4-6 hours non stop during some sessions without a hiccup or crash. Once it’s setup in SteamOS you don’t need to do any further fiddling.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't have to mess with anything once everything was installed. Plays decently, no hitches or slowdowns. Just don't bother with the high texture download. Hit level 30 so far.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Agree fully with this guy. Once it’s setup it works. And with everything on low you get 60 fps.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Same as the other two once it is setup it runs good on low I lock mine to 40 and no issues at all. Can do high level 30+ nightmare dungeons with no issues

[–] Sterben 2 points 1 year ago

It works fine for me, but I am a bit frustrated at the moment bacause my Steam Deck is having a problem.

Contacted support, and it may be a charging problem. My Deck crashes when I am playing plugged. It could be as I am living in Australia, so it may be an adapter issue (hopefully).

Other than that, Diablo 4 is very playable on Steam Deck.

[–] null_ 1 points 1 year ago

The only issues I have are with the Battlenet launcher, it sometimes crashes during startup when first opening D4 seemingly at random but once the game is running I don’t have any issues. Currently running it on Proton Experimental.

As far as settings go, at default settings D4 seems to be extremely taxing on the GPU (constant >=97% usage, high temps, crashes regularly after running for a while), although this seems to be common to all systems including PS5/Xbox.

Locking refresh rate and in-game menu FPS to 50fps keeps the power and GPU usage much lower and I get stable performance with no crashes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Following up again. It’s much better playing with a 45 FPS cap and with FSR off than 60 cap and FSR on.

load more comments
view more: next ›