this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
338 points (92.5% liked)

AnarchyChess

5266 readers
3 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
[email protected]
[email protected]

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rockSlayer 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can support them by realizing that white male capitalist patriarchy is pitting you against each other as a distraction, so the solution is Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism

[–] Fedizen 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't trust the rooks, all rooks are ~~bastards~~ crooks

[–] n00b001 8 points 1 year ago
[–] jopepa 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

White wins on a patriarchal technicality, though black still has advantage

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

And the moral high ground.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Two queens? Black can't lose.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Games have been won against opponents with multiple queens

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But how many have won against an opponent with no king?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There’s no king to put in check, though. But also I wasn’t talking seriously or in absolute terms.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[This comment has been deleted by an automated system]

[–] TheSpermWhale 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] SuddenlyBlowGreen 17 points 1 year ago

That only works if your opponent is a minor.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your opponent already lost by losing the king. The end.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

at least they gained a queen in the process

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure, but Descriptive Notation for black is going to be complicated.