this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
22 points (95.8% liked)

UK Politics

3066 readers
124 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both [email protected] and [email protected] .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

[email protected] appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He is worried about party member's backlash. Johnson still has some following in that area. I seem to remember the last poll putting Johnson's fanbase at around 20% in the Tory party. They have their backs to the wall in the next GE. Every vote will count. This is why Labour forced a division, which meant Tory MPs had to have their vote recorded over the anonymity of a vocal vote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you might be on the money there.

I was thinking it might be some "don't deliver the killing blow, he might be useful one day", but treating it like Mr. Trump with his fans makes more sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Politicians are a brutal group. The last thing they consider is another MP's feelings. My particular opinion is that this group of Tories are the most callous I have ever seen. There was a theory flying around a few weeks back that Sunak was worried Johnson may release something about him, but then again the same thing was said about Raab. For me the proof of that argument will be if Sunak selects Johnson for Mid Bedfordshire when Mad Nads leaves. Johnson's brand is toxic atm. There is absolutely nothing to gain from selecting Johnson, so you would have to wonder why he would do this.

[–] Syreniac 1 points 1 year ago

The more restrictive your democracy (countrywide PR system < FPTP marginal constituencies < Conservative party members) the wackier the effects on the people trying to win elections in that democracy.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine you have two aresholes. Not you personally, we're talking about people who happen to be arseholes. Now imagine one of them is finally, unambiguously, unequivocally revealed to be an arsehole. The other arsehole might not want to throw stones on the basis that deep down inside they know that they, too, are an arsehole who just hasn't been revealed as such yet. It'll come. They know it will, eventually. So they don't want to make too big a deal of castigating the one who has been found out because they know it will ultimately come to bite them on the arse. Hole.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Johnson now has a big megaphone in his DM column that points directly at the remaining Conservative voters. If Sunak displeases Johnson then he’ll stop drivelling on about diet pills and start lobbing hand grenades.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Condemming Johnson would mean Sunak would have to do something.

[–] TVPaulD 1 points 1 year ago

Weak! Weak! Weak! That is the reason: his weakness.

load more comments
view more: next ›