The whole Canadian federal House of Commons cheered and honored a Nazi for their service during Zelenskyy's visit. A blunder of international proportions, Russian media is taking full advantage of the coverage. It's ridiculous this was allowed to happen and that nobody checked or cared about what the "First Ukrainian Division" was. Credit to the Marxists and Jewish advocacy groups for first researching and publicizing this before the mainstream news picked it up days later.
this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2023
70 points (92.7% liked)
politics
19232 readers
3888 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"It's ridiculous this was allowed to happen and that nobody checked or cared about what the "First Ukrainian Division" was."
The guy who invited and introduced him said he did it because the dude was from his district, and didn't bother to tell anybody about it, which is plausable, I guess. What's shocking to me is that he is the Speaker of the House. He clearly didn't do his research, and doesn't know his history (he said the Nazi bravely fought the Russians for the independence of Ukraine, or some stupid shit like that). What is this, the US?
Things get a bit murky with the volounters of eastern europe there was a ss division from balticum that after the war where put as guards at nurnberg.
Yeah unfortunately a lot of that murkiness involved siding with Hitler even if the individual was only motivated by Ukrainian independence, at least that's probably the best case scenario, a lot of times that also involved fascist sentiments. These units committed atrocities, not all of them, but they were all treated the same after the war and allowed to resettle. Is it possible with some of these individuals to empathize but not sympathize as a historical approach would take? Whatever the answer, I don't think it's appropriate to honor them for their service like what just happened in the entire house of commons.
Calling it a blunder might even be an understatement, although I don't think a lot of the House knew this was happening or had a chance to assess this guy before they performatively "honored" him, which potentially makes it even stupider.
They where not all allowed too resettle in stalins ussr
Oh dear fuck how do you screw up this bad
This is the best summary I could come up with:
TORONTO (AP) — The speaker of Canada’s House of Commons apologized Sunday for recognizing a man who fought for a Nazi military unit during World War II.
Just after Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered an address in the House of Commons on Friday, Canadian lawmakers gave 98-year-old Yaroslav Hunka a standing ovation when Speaker Anthony Rota drew attention to him.
Canadian lawmakers cheered and Zelenskyy raised his fist in acknowledgement as Hunka saluted from the gallery during two separate standing ovations.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office said in a statement that Rota had apologized and accepted full responsibility for issuing the invitation to Hunka and for the recognition in Parliament.
The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center for Holocaust Studies issued a statement Sunday saying the division “was responsible for the mass murder of innocent civilians with a level of brutality and malice that is unimaginable.”
“An apology is owed to every Holocaust survivor and veteran of the Second World War who fought the Nazis, and an explanation must be provided as to how this individual entered the hallowed halls of Canadian Parliament and received recognition from the Speaker of the House and a standing ovation,” the statement said.
The original article contains 574 words, the summary contains 198 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
