this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
260 points (82.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35703 readers
1008 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Another Reddit refugee here,

I think we're all familiar with the Karma system on Reddit. Do you think Lemmy should have something similar? Because I can see cases for and against it.

For: a way to tracking quality contributions by a user, quantifying reputation. Useful to keep new accounts from spamming communities.

Against: Often not a useful metric, can be botted or otherwise unearned (see u/spez), maybe we should have something else?

What do you all think?

(page 5) 38 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jerrimu 1 points 1 year ago

It has some kind of points, which is all I need. Internet points motivate me, and obviously some others too. Chasing karma made me contribute more to reddit than I would have otherwise.

[–] Guatch 1 points 1 year ago

I Gota downvote this idea. Karma was my least favorite part about Reddit

[–] sapetoku 1 points 1 year ago

Please no, no karma, nobody needs another dopamine addiction. Being able to positively mark good comments is helpful, but it shouldn't influence anything - only positive reinforcement.

[–] penguinsAreRapists 1 points 1 year ago

No on karma but I would like to be able to buy and give awards as a way to support this

[–] Ghostalmedia 1 points 1 year ago

I encouraged me to create good OC, but it encouraged others to farm and post clickbate.

I could go either way, but I have a slight bias toward having it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. I'd rather no up voting/downvoting on comments at all. It discourages discussion.

[–] Willer 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Top comments are mostly extremely shortsighted bs.

[–] scarabic 1 points 1 year ago

Still, there’s sometimes that 3rd or 4th comment from the top that isn’t just a dumb joke and actually has the real answer. Without voting, that would just be totally lost among the thousands of other comments. I’m pro karma. I mostly didn’t care for the big subs but in smaller ones where real questions and answers are happening, voting is really helpful for figuring out who is talking out of their ass. It’s not perfect, but it helps.

[–] Willer 0 points 1 year ago

Mfers arguing whether reddits equivalent of a captcha will affect social interaction.

[–] lysistrata -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, there's no karma here? Bye, it's been fun.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PixxlMan -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it should, but perhaps it shouldn't be as prominent as on Reddit, and maybe it should be called something more boring, like "post vote sum" or something, to make people place less importance on it.

Edit: would love some input as to why this suggestion is being downvoted. ^Or is this just an example of the circleherky behavior you were all convinced was because of karma...?^

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›