this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
38 points (93.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
24 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justhach 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Interestingly enough, "Jaywalking" was a term inteiduced by the automobile industry in the early days of driving.

Back in pre-car days, streets were for people, and when those spaces were starting to be shared with cars, fatalities ensued (mostly children and the elderly).

People were demanding slower speed limits, and even outright bans of cars, so the automobile industry did what it does best: shoved propaganda down the public's throat, and blamed the walkers.

A "jay" was a term for a hick from the sticks who didnt understand city ways. So, calling someone a "jay walker" was saying that they were just an ignorant country bumpkin who didnt know how streets worked, and you're not an ignorant country bumpkin, are you?

[–] ouigol 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As a European, it’s quite strange hearing Americans get arrested for jaywalking. I don’t even know if it’s illegal here, since everyone does it constantly. I really don’t see a benefit of it being illegal, but then again, I think our cities are way less trafficked and dangerous for pedestrians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Perhaps in Germany? It's definitely an odd thought that people in cars have more legal rights than you as a pedestrian.

[–] Sorenchu 3 points 2 years ago

The author makes several excellent points - the kind you would get from a humanities or ethnic studies course - that show how laws are enforced to target and oppress specific demographics. Initially these anti-"jaywalking" laws were put in place at the behest of the auto manufactures to remove pedestrians from the streets so cars can travel unimpeded, but as many laws in the Jim Crow era did, they targeted people of color, primarily in poorer parts of town. Removing these laws, followed by reclaiming these voids within our communities as public space, we will likely see improvements in our neighborhoods.

An interesting connection to this is community building through place-making. Streets and roads, etc. divide communities and removes what was once a common space and replaces it with a void of liminal travel lanes that pose a risk to everyone that is on it or even nearby. Removal of some roads and putting others on a kind of diet to slim them out and reduce their speeds can increase communal interactions. Increases in community interactions and development of personal connections has been shown to reduce crime and increase overall well being. That is without even touching the health benefits of reducing or eliminating car travel.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Everybody jaywalks where I live, you wouldn't even be able to tell it was a law lol

[–] RaoulDook 2 points 2 years ago

Legalize Ranch!