this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
28 points (78.0% liked)

Be sure to read the rule before you leave

125 readers
1 users here now

Rule 3: If you visit MoreTankie196, you are contractually obliged to post before you leave

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
28
white "people" (/s) (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

yakubian atrocities, the lot of you

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

In the religious canon of the black nationalist Amerikan group Nation of Islam, Yakub was a scientist who... well, I'll let them explain I guess:

I have absolutely nothing worthwhile to say regarding this. I'll just go with "uh huh".

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

have to admit, if thats how ot went down, thatd be some tricknology indeed

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s the group that killed Malcom x, right?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yep and the current leader admitted to having had something to with it (prolly planed it) on an interview in tv and no one seems to give a shit especially not the pigs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

No, no, I've heard about this junk. I'm more concerned about the title and the text below

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Funnily enough if that was correct, it would mean the white people are victims of huge atrocity.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I assume this is a "shit reactionaries say"-type post

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There are some delusional believers to this, but it’s mostly died out.

The vast majority of “Yakub believers” are doing it for shits and giggles because of how absurd it is.

I hope this person isn’t genuine, but the title and caption are giving me Poe’s Law vibes.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

based on OP's history here, I think the intent was to make fun of the image (or the image is satirical), but for future reference I think it's best to be unambiguous in these situations (just adding "/s" would be enough)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I agree, I feel like the loss of tone over text didn’t help OP, but it’s definitely not genuine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

added one 👍

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It feels more like a shitpost with a few layers of irony over it, in the same style as "Santa denier" memes.