this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
121 points (90.6% liked)

Games

16956 readers
888 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Happily, PlayStation 5 manages to deliver a creditable rendition of the game, but the now legendary Act Three continues to humble CPU performance - perhaps more than we anticipated going in.

all 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Weslee 46 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It's runs on ultra on my 1060 gtx, I'm not surprised it runs well on consoles, the game is pretty nicely optimized

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You probably haven't gotten to Act 3 yet, the game is extremely CPU bound. I have a Ryzen 9 7950X and while Act 1 and 2 were basically locked to 144fps the entire time, in Act 3 I have seen dips down to the 40s.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Try turning off "Dynamic Crowds" in settings. I didn't notice much difference in how the crowds behaved, but it supposedly simplifies their AI and pathfinding to cut down on CPU use. It helped me a lot in the city.

[–] Weslee 5 points 1 year ago

Ah my CPU is pretty modern compared to the 1060, and no I'm not even into act 2 yet

[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter 2 points 1 year ago

3080 + 12700k @4k. I needed to run everything in performance mode on DLSS to get even a consistent 60. Still jittery in the big areas.

[–] holiday 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

2060 super user here. I'm assuming you haven't made it to Act 3? The game has some performance issues there. I happily turned down the graphics to continue playing smoothly but was a tad disappointed.

I'm on my second playthrough though and they have patched it since my first experience so hopefully the evil campaign runs (visually) smoother.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Act 3's issues aren't GPU bound, it's entirely CPU bottlenecked. It's likely someone with a slower GPU won't see as big a drop in performance in act 3 as you, and it's likely you don't see any performance gain from using DLSS in act 3. My 2080 Super was sleeping through it even at 3440x1440 on ultra while my Ryzen 7 3700x was getting thrashed.

[–] sp6 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

More info from the article: quality mode is 1440p 30fps, and performance mode is 960p (upscaled to 1440p using FSR2) 60fps. Although late-game, specifically the big cities in act 3, can dip into mid-20fps range

[–] Voyajer 12 points 1 year ago

So not exactly

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't get all the performance complaints about Act 3. The worst lag I ever had in the entire game was the first time I walked into the druid grove, dropped to 1-5fps for like 20 seconds and then it was more or less fine the rest of the game. One crash in 160 hours of playing, and I'm still on patch 0.2 atm.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait did you play like 5 hours a day or is that the beta?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

That is the full release only. It's also less than accurate to say 5 hours a day everyday, it was more like 10-15 hours a day with some days where I didn't play at all.

[–] catshit_dogfart 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I think this game could run on PS4 just fine. Turn off raytracing and a few other things and it would probably work.

But then, I guess they can't keep releasing for the old console forever.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems pretty CPU limited and the CPU on last gen was dogshit from day one.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I ran it on an i7 4790k initially and definitely felt it. I think you're right that whatever APU is in the PS4 would scream and run.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

There's no RT in BG3. At least not yet.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Given that the issue with the Xbox S is the split screen, I'd suspect that the PS4 would have the same issue.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it runs very nicely on ultra on a variety of hardware. It's been optimized and has even improved since release.

I am hoping they improved the controller interface, though. I use that even though I play the PC version, and it was somewhat broken as of a couple weeks ago.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This article repeatedly says that the game is running in 1440p, but I thought that the PS5 didn’t support 1440p. TIL they added it.