this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
22 points (78.9% liked)

Australia

3582 readers
284 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @[email protected] who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @[email protected] and @[email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I am very much enjoying this cute phase Zoomers are going through at the moment where they "discover" things we all did 10 - 20 years ago and turn it into a social media trend. Like the dumb phone one that's also happening at the moment, with some young people rejecting smartphones in favour of flip phones Millennials used in high school.

But in all seriousness, this is actually a useful life hack if you are trying to restrict spending or live on a budget.

[–] Junkers_Klunker 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is not their fault for not knowing, it is our fault for not teaching.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe we just need to call it "budgeting hack", not "financial planning".

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah it's a good method but the "envelope" budgeting systemn has existed for decades.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

What is old is new again, just with bloat on top.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Most people use a binder with individual pockets or sleeves, with a label for each expense — for example, groceries, petrol, and eating out.

Financial expert and CEO of WeMoney Daniel Jovevski said the rise in popularity of cash stuffing took him by surprise.

"Having that physical product and that cash in my hand, that makes it a lot more easier to use, and for my mind to comprehend what I'm saving per week."

Mr Jovevski adds the lack of transparency means consumers "probably don't know the total fees they're paying".

He also raises the point that there are some risks involved in carrying around a lot of cash, such as theft, but he acknowledges that "everyone's situation is unique".

It not only lowers the risk factor of having large sums of money at home, but it also means you can still accrue interest on your savings.


The original article contains 893 words, the summary contains 145 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I haven't used cash for anything except dodgy Facebook and Gumtree buys in a decade. I currently have the better part of $1000 in cash in my wallet that has collected because I just never use it. I haven't entered a bank branch in probably a similar time frame, and they (BankWest) closed the branches near here so I'm not even sure where to deposit it if I wanted to.

You know what I like about bank accounts? You don't get drunk and leave your bank account in the back of a taxi home. And a house fire doesn't burn down your bank account. There's also a slightly less chance that people will break in to your home and steal your bank account, though it's probably a coin flip compared to scammers and what not.

[–] Urbanfox 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You'll also pay more by going into shops and using cash..

Big bag of dog food from local shop, £65.

Same bag from online only retailer with free shipping? £38.

Cash only is not a good way to budget.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But at what cost? Sure the individual will save in the short run on the occasional bag of dog food, but society at large will lose options that avoid tracking and outside intervention. The push for online shopping isn't for your convenience, it's for control over your life and your spending. In the future there will be only a handful of companies total, and they'll essentially become the government if we don't wake up and shake shit up.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Imagine having enough money to have the luxury of making moral choices with it lmao

[–] Urbanfox 3 points 1 year ago

If you have enough money to support local retailers then absolutely - it's important.

But if you're struggling to the extent that you're envolope budgeting to make sure everything gets a share, then you've got bigger more immediate problems than Costco becoming so big you get your law degree from there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is nowhere close to new. People have been doing this for centuries. It was called the envelope method a couple generations ago

[–] Custoslibera 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is insane.

Why would you complicate your life like this when there are digital options to accomplish the same result?

[–] daed 6 points 1 year ago

It probably works for some people man. More power to em. I agree with you though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's just influencer trash. Playing around with cash is the only way to make a visually engaging video about budgeting.

[–] CheeseToastie 2 points 1 year ago

So it's the same as running the Google sheets monthly budget template but with cash. Not a bad idea per se, but i can see the risk in withdrawing so much in cash to accomplish it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I've been wondering if there's a way to do this with actual bank accounts. I know with ING I can only have like 2 savings/transactional accounts (1 joint, 1 personal).

I'd like to be able to spin up accounts for these categories and use them as the "envelopes" instead of relying on cash.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes.

I'm with bank Australia they let me have as many sub accounts as i please, no fees.

There's savings, bill kitty, rates, honeypot (building a six month expense nest egg separate to savings) car kitty, cat emergencies, house emergencies. Anything left on the main card-accessibile account is groceries and pissing away money. Been running that since the 90's. Works so well husband has been throwing his half in there as well since '07

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

@Taleya @bmck

Partner and I have 2 individual accounts where we get our personal money paid in and a main bill paying account that covers everything not related to personal stuff. We both contribute to the main account and pay out from that each fortnight for our "allowances".

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://bankaust.com.au/ ?

I was looking at their site and could see anything about sub-accounts?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bankaust, yup. You just slap an online saver or three in there.