this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2023
88 points (91.5% liked)

Science

13141 readers
86 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What's that saying again? Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence? I don't think we're quite there yet, but for all of you MOdified Newtonian Dynamics fans (and Dark Matter haters) out there here's a bit of good news.

all 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donjuanme 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't need to hate dark matter to appreciate both theories have their positives and their hold ups. There's forces at work that we don't understand, one camp poses we can add an unknown mass to make things work, the other poses we can add an unknown modifier to a force to make things work. Neither theory works perfectly, neither theory has (of yet) an identifiable mechanism. I don't know how this is a divisive issue, there's legit scientific practices happening from both camps.

I subscribe to Sabine Hossenfelder's take on things, "the distinction between dark matter and modified gravity is a false dichotomy, the answer isn't either/or, it's both, it's just a matter of how do we combine them" 2 years ago in this video. https://youtu.be/4_qJptwikRc

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just watched that video somewhat recently and couldn't understand that quote. There are a number of MOND models that literally don't involve dark matter at all -- no new particles added, no unexplained masses needed. So in that case, wouldn't "how we combine them" just be "set dark matter to 0 and use this different set of equations to solve for gravity in certain circumstances"?

[–] MotoAsh 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The MOND models are less accurate than cold dark mater models. As long as MOND fails to explain current phenomina, cold dark matter wins. Period.

I am a fan of the idea that the standard model is incomplete/wrong, but you cannot in good conscience accept a model that fits the data worse all because the current best model has problems.

A proper answer explains why the current model works but is inaccurate. MOND models straight up disagree.

[–] nbafantest 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A scientist has observed a “gravitational anomaly” in certain star systems

Seems like the opening to a Star Trek episode

[–] cmbabul 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A warp drive is one of the few innovations that might save humanity from our current peril, here’s hoping

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh, why do you think that? Why would faster than light speed technology have a different impact on society than our current space technologies? (Assuming we don't encounter aliens)

[–] cmbabul -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean we’d all still be fucked but a generation ship could give hope to the survival of the species as a whole

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We haven't even gotten people to Mars and it would "only" be a couple of year trip with current technology. I can't imagine society making a generational trip happen any time soon. Sorry for being a Debbie downer.

[–] cmbabul 1 points 1 year ago

I mean society as a while sure won’t, but desperate times and all that, unlikely for sure but it’s a glimmer

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

If humanity has proven anything it's that technology tends to make things worse.

[–] nachobel 2 points 1 year ago

I’ve read 3bp…shit

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago