This is some boringdistopia shit. Some bot damn near ruins a family and won't even tell them why.
this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2023
25 points (83.8% liked)
Mildly Infuriating
35768 readers
677 users here now
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating.
-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.
-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No, a family that could not afford to own a second home bought one and then couldn’t profit from it.
exactly. The housing market already sucks for people to be buying a 2nd house specifically to use as AirBnB to profit
I really wish more municipalities would put measures making this shit less profitable. My expectations are low, but if people don’t fight it’s even lower.
They couldn't profit from it because of a bot. That issue is going to get more widespread and someone you know will be affected by it.
I think that maybe the lesson I'm learning in these last few years (through the misadventures of others), is that trusting platforms with your livelihood is not a very good idea. It's just too fragile.
I'm OK to use them as a tool, but whatever business I build must be able to survive suddenly losing access.
That’s seems like reasonable.
I’m sure I’m not telling you anything new, but if you use them for marketing I’d always try to include your self hosted link. Before retiring for health reasons I worked in mfr and I know when we would have shortages from our existing suppliers for actual parts we’d also start just googling that part directly and occasionally would find new suppliers that way though that involved more risks and extra testing of the parts ordered so it wasn’t a regular thing.
For consumer stuff I enjoyed a lot of reddits comics and am glad I bookmarked those artists site so I can give them clicks directly. Plus I won’t miss out on limited sales of merch for some of them. There was a dragon plushie I regret missing. Good luck on your business.
I think we need more competition and anti trust enforcement on the big conglomerates that own majority’s of any said market. Sometimes feel like we are going through another robber baron stage in the US.
As someone who can't afford to buy even one home (and barely can afford to pay rent), I don't really sympathize with people who buy multiple homes, just to rent them out. However, sympathy or not, it's still not okay how AirBnB handled the situation. Just because I don't really care for the reason that they have a second home that they want to rent out, doesn't mean that they should be treated inhumanely. Two "wrongs" don't make a right, and frankly, even if I have little sympathy for people who choose to own multiple homes, it's not inherently wrong. At least they planned to use it for a purpose for themselves part of the time, which is more than I can say for people or companies that just buy up homes exclusively to rent out (with no intention of ever utilizing it for a practical personal purpose). And frankly, if AirBnB treats them like this, who's to say it couldn't treat anyone else like this, be it a renter or host? I'm sure we've all dealt with being mistreated by customer "support" at various companies, and it's not something anyone likes, and it's certainly not okay to send canned responses that are likely flat out lies. I bet they never did an investigation at all until these people went public. And if it's really "humans" on the other end of the emails, I'm sure it's just people hired to copy/paste set phrases into an email and hit "send". Not people who are meant to actually look into issues and personally respond. The issue I'm seeing is that AirBnB's "response" to these people is part of a societal flaw that, in this case, hurt people who maybe some people might not feel sympathy for, and maybe rightly so. However, as this can happen to anyone (be it with AirBnB or any other of the many many companies that have similarly shitty customer service), it's a terrible precedent to be setting, that can hurt all of us.
Agree with this. I think we need to treat whether we empathize with the person separately from how corporates treat people.
Looks as though silencing individuals without records is becoming a trend, with the other notable news of Amazon banning someone for something they didn't do that I saw just a few days after I saw this news.