this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
128 points (98.5% liked)

World News

32447 readers
1375 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

12,500 ft underwater? Pass.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yeah this sounds like a bespoke Hell created just for me in case I am very, very evil in this lifetime. Inconceivable that people would pay actual money to experience this. :(

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A quarter million dollars to get in an Atlantan fleshlight.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

*Atlantean but kek

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck,

fucking mind-boggling

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago

The price includes the chance to become part of the attraction for future tourists.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I could live for years off of that. Holy craps

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Heheheh. Rich ghouls.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

OOF. Fuck it, take an upvote. 🤣

[–] ki77erb 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I can think of a lot of things I would rather spend $250,000 on. I guess it's worth it to some!

[–] partial_accumen 9 points 2 years ago

I imagine the people that are paying $250k per seat are very very wealthy. Would you send $1 on a bottle of cold water at an event? As fast as you answered that, there are people that spend $250k with the same ease. To them $250k is like $1.

I can tell you thats not me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Who needs a million dollar idea when you can have a $250,000 per person idea and head to the local aquarium.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

How does one even plan for contingencies? 96-hour life support, but can specialized rescue subs get there in time?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I feel like a proper contingency in this scenario would be some sort of "instant death" system. Knowing you're going to die, but waiting 96 hours for it to happen sounds terrible.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get where you're coming from but this sounds like an insanely bad idea. Perhaps I'd agree with you if there was something like cyanide pills people could opt to take, but even then I'm hesitant. There should be no way for one person (or some subset of people) to decide for everyone that now is the time to die; if someone wants to be in their head and push the limit and die at the last minute, that's their call and theirs alone. Also, if there is some miraculous rescue but someone has pulled the "instant death" switch, they've effectively murdered the rest of the people.

[–] 666dollarfootlong 1 points 2 years ago

One key for each person and all keys need to be turned to unlock pressure release or whatever it was that made those people just implode in a fraction of a millisecond that one time

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've been toying around with some design concepts for a DIY submarine for like a decade now. The first thing I thought about, right after "how do I control it going up/down" was "what do I do when that system fails, and I need to ascend in an emergency?" My thought was to have some scuba tanks attached to deployable salvage lift bags, so even if my ballasts were completely screwed, I could still ascend.

If there's not something analogous to that on board the Titan, I'd be shocked at their stupidity; It seems incredibly foolhardy to intentionally go somewhere that no rescue vehicle can recover you, without secondary and tertiary systems in place to rescue yourself.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've always been fascinated by submarines. I've wanted to make a remote control one with fpv but radio signals don't penetrate water very well underwater. If I have to have it tethered to a signal wire it's just "meh".

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Would be nice as journalist to be insistent on inquiring the duration of the dive so far.

They write it's missing – but it is obvious where it is.

They write contact was lost, but it is unknown when. This seems to be the whole point of such a news. Was contact lost 4 hours ago or 4 days ago? Contact lost 4h ago would probably be all fine, as they mention the dive tour takes around 8 hours. 4 days ago would mean they are all dead, as oxygen lasts that long according to the article.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

"Stay tuned to the text article for the exciting conclusion!"

-bbc.co.uk

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Also the link someone else posted says it has life support for 96 hours

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And it left on Sunday around 6am to start the 96 hr timer. Best case they lost power, dropped their load, and floated to the surface and are just bobbing around somewhere in the ocean.

[–] hurp_mcderp 1 points 2 years ago

If that were one of the possible scenarios, you'd think they'd have the foresight to at least have an EPIRB or something.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They may as well be on the moon.

Curious if they are connected via a tether of some type.

Either way, that’s not good and really sad.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's no way they wouldn't be able to deploy a bouy with a gps tied to the sub that floats to the surface, or something similar. Like your trapped in a metal can underwater you better have several contingency plans.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

If they're miles down it would probably float off before it got to the surface.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

True Anon taught me to never, ever get into small passenger aircraft. Guess a new vehicle get added to that li-

Tour firm OceanGate, which runs $250,000-a-seat expeditions to the wreck

Yeah ok, never in my lifetime would I even het a chance lmao

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

There's not even seats in it!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

It's not as expensive as it seems because it'll work out as $125k per wreck now.

[–] frozengriever 8 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What a nightmare scenario. What about plumbing and water for 96 hours? How scary. Poor passengers!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

They have a toilet behind a curtain. Imagine trying to hold poop for 3+ days.. Imagine being the first one that poops and the odour.... My eyes are stinging thinking about it...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are we calling this? OceanGate-gate?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Titanic 2: Revenge of the Ship

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is only one billionaire aboard, seem like a waste of space.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

There are ~~2640~~ 2639 billionaires in the world. It may not be much when you think about it, but it's a great start!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

OceanGate - with that name, I think they were onto something...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Maybe they should look under water instead of under way...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Needle in a haystack:

Rescue teams involved in the hunt for a missing submersible that had planned to visit the wrecked Titanic said "noises" had been detected early Wednesday close to where the sub ended contact with its control ship.

U.S. Coast Guard Rear Adm. John Mauger said the source of the noise was still unclear.

[–] autonomous 2 points 2 years ago
load more comments
view more: next ›